Welcome to the world of professional-grade predatory perversion. NAMBLA stands for the North American Man-Boy Love Association. They are a group of “men” (using the term loosely, mainly 30+) who actively pursue hookups with underage boys. They like to use historical “evidence,” like some Ancient Greek societies’ toleration of certain cases of pedophilia, to garner support for their movement. But like Satanists, they seem to be looking to feed off of the prepubescent’s lushe, or purest form of emotional terror, to bolster their immortality.

Understandably but not excusably, most of the general population does not suspect that NAMBLA (or any organization of predators) could possibly exist in the United States of America; instead we assume it was something made up for that episode of South Park (“Super Adventure Club” or SAC). This is in the order of organizations, like the Illuminati, that ritually abuse and sacrifice their own children or who hunt down tribal people. These monsters are very powerful in our world–their experience in abuse teaches them a lot about manipulating people–and the cover-up operation is extensive. The ever-evil South Park / Daily Show Media Cabal works diligently to cover up and/or minimize NAMBLA members’ very real perversion, crimes and threats to the whole purpose of our legal system: defending the innocent and innocence from the guilty and twisted. This and the Second Amendment are probably the two most glaring areas where it is clear that Jon Stuart of The Daily Show (who makes constant “humorous” allusions to his own sexual ambiguity) and his team of deranged satirists sell their public down the river. So contrary to their con-job, NAMBLA is neither fake nor funny. NAMBLA is very real and very serious. I personally have run into members, and they are very hard to identify unless one possess a superb intuition. The youth-predator is often, though not exclusively, found in groups that offer something to the younger generation: a church, youth study/discussion group, musical venue, library, public schools, sports coach/instructor, tutor…can even be married with kids. It’s their instinct to be where children are and win the trust of (usually weaker or single) parents. The youth-predator’s whole game is one of misdirecting your suspicions, of disorienting. He/she is the most accomplished actor you’re ever likely to meet. The youth-predator is occasionally wealthy and often active in his/her community such that he/she strings society along, leading them to assume he/she is a tireless worker for his/her community and is far from erotic in his/her thoughts. He/she is secular and socialite in manner. Put it this way: he/she is always the last person you expect, so trust yourself–your own judgment–least of anything.

↗ Michael Jackson, the Disneyan (Oc)Cult of Youth

↗ National sex offender registry

↗ Megan’s Law, to identify convicted pedophiles in your neighborhood

By definition the pedophile tends to flirt with youths, which includes abnormal amounts of sweet-talk and physical contact. NAMBLA is active within the ACLU, trying to find a legal way to let adults and minors have consensual romantic affairs. The Fourteenth Amendment, arguably, is to blame for things having gotten as far as they have in this sector. They get away with a lot mostly because they keep a low profile, and the élite, many of whom are members, are complicit by their silence or even, in the case of Jon Stuart, make light of it.

While NAMBLA is based in San Francisco and New York, Butterfly Kisses (or Bengal Klockans), its lesser-known female equivalent, is based in Sweden.

Key names to remember in connection with NAMBLA include: Bill Andriette, Samuel R. Delany, Allen Ginsberg, Harry Hay and David Thorstad.

↗ Facebook group exposing NAMBLA’s agenda and members

Psychopathology and personality traits, in Wikipedia’s Pedophilia article:

Several researchers have reported correlations between pedophilia and certain psychological characteristics, such as low self-esteem and poor social skills. Cohen et al. (2002), studying child sex offenders, states that pedophiles have impaired interpersonal functioning and elevated passive-aggressiveness, as well as impaired self-concept. Regarding disinhibitory traits, pedophiles demonstrate elevated psychopathy and propensity for cognitive distortions. According to the authors, pathologic personality traits in pedophiles lend support to a hypothesis that such pathology is related to both motivation for and failure to inhibit pedophilic behavior.

According to Wilson and Cox (1983), “The paedophiles emerge as significantly higher on Psychoticism, Introversion and Neurotocism than age-matched controls. [But] there is a difficulty in untangling cause and effect. We cannot tell whether paedophiles gravitate towards children because, being highly introverted, they find the company of children less threatening than that of adults, or whether the social withdrawal implied by their introversion is a result of the isolation engendered by their preference i.e., awareness of the social approbation and hostility that it evokes” (p. 324).

Studying child sex offenders, a review of qualitative research studies published between 1982 and 2001 concluded that pedophiles use cognitive distortions to meet personal needs, justifying abuse by making excuses, redefining their actions as love and mutuality, and exploiting the power imbalance inherent in all adult-child relationships. Other cognitive distortions include the idea of “children as sexual beings”, “uncontrollability of sexuality”, and “sexual entitlement-bias”.

One review of the literature concludes that research on personality correlates and psychopathology in pedophiles is rarely methodologically correct, in part owing to confusion between pedophiles and child sex offenders, as well as the difficulty of obtaining a representative, community sample of pedophiles. Seto (2004) points out that pedophiles who are available from a clinical setting are likely there because of distress over their sexual preference or pressure from others. This increases the likelihood that they will show psychological problems. Similarly, pedophiles recruited from a correctional setting have been convicted of a crime, making it more likely that they will show anti-social characteristics.

While not causes of pedophilia themselves, childhood abuse by adults or comorbid psychiatric illnesses—such as personality disorders and substance abuse—are risk factors for acting on pedophilic urges. Blanchard, Cantor, and Robichaud (2006) noted about comorbid psychiatric illnesses that, “The theoretical implications are not so clear. Do particular genes or noxious factors in the prenatal environment predispose a male to develop both affective disorders and pedophilia, or do the frustration, danger, and isolation engendered by unacceptable sexual desires—or their occasional furtive satisfaction—lead to anxiety and despair?” They indicated that, because they previously found mothers of pedophiles to be more likely to have undergone psychiatric treatment, the genetic possibility is more likely.

 

The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know” (John Fitzgerald Kennedy, address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961).

❤ I love my awesome sponsors! ❤