Brace yourself for the most Jerry Springer biography you’ve ever read. Rev. John Padberg, Director of the Institute of Jesuit Resources (!), recounts how a knight once accused Íñigo López (falsely Latinized Ignatius of Loyola) and his brother Pedro López of “roughing up” a man who was trying to steal the latter’s mistress. This (sigh, allegedly) took place in Íñigo López’s native town of Azpeitia.
This ghetto Íñigo López character is apparently the one Roman Catholic “saint with a notarized police record on file” for gang violence in which his gang beat another gang that was trying to take a man’s mistress on behalf of that man’s brother. This was, the Jesuit assures the audience, “before his conversion”–and the man clearly did undergo some kind of spiritual transformation–yet this kind of ignoble violence seems a more widespread feature of Jesuit history than Fr. Padberg seems eager to discuss. The Jesuits stopped allowing “conversos”–Jews and Arabs–about a generation after their founding and up until 1945 (whereupon their fall from Roman Catholic “orthodoxy” began and whereupon the papacy itself weakened [see Second Vatican Council], though arguably the Jesuits were always Nestorians even before they were card-carrying Communists as nearly all are today).
“The three forms of initiation—individual, group, or universal—all lead to conscious or unconscious control by a central power, who in some mysterious way makes its influence felt; often clairvoyantly and clairaudiently seen and heard, but never physically present or visible. The system in all three is the same—cabalistic. Secretly here and there individuals are prepared; these again form groups or centers from which influences spread until they form a network covering the entire world. Like rays from a hidden sun these groups are apparently divergent and detached, but in reality all issue from the same central body. The system is seen to be an insidious and secret dissemination of ideas, orienting and breaking down all barriers of family, religion, morality, nationality, and all self-initiative thought, always under the cloak of a new and more modern religion, new thought, new morality, a new heaven and a new earth; until it evolves a gigantic robot merely answering to the will and commands of a secret Mastermind. They dream they are free, original, self-determining individuals; they are but the negative moon reflecting and reproducing the light from the same hidden and cabalistic Sun. It is called ‘regeneration’ by the Illuminati; it is in truth individual death and disintegration, followed by a resurrection as negative ‘light-bearers’ of this cabalistic dark Sun whose Luciferian ‘Grand Plan’ is world domination” (Inquire Within, Light-Bearers of Darkness, p105). ↗ Notes about the Illuminati
Note: to cancel a vow—particularly one made to an unworthy institution or under dubious circumstances (such as deceitfulness or opacity [i.e. secretiveness])—all that is required is full, free and willing renunciation of the organization in question, and an attempt to notify their head honcho…and whoosh! Out of your life!
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know” (John Fitzgerald Kennedy, address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961).