This page is dedicated to the sorrowing mothers who were bamboozled
into going against their God-given instincts and their better judgment,
ironically in the name of the Mother of Sorrows.
“When I met the so-called ‘leader’ of the Legionaries’ cult, he looked more like a mafia don than a humble priest!”
The new Jesuits, “élite bullies for Christ”↗ Toward the real Marcial Maciel (article)
↗ ReGAIN: networking, scoops and breaking updates
↗ What is NAMBLA?
Perspectives that are some shade of Roman Catholic:
↗ New Oxford Review dossier
“Some of the harshest critics of the Legionaries of Christ are orthodox Catholics; and they’re not upset about the Order’s fidelity to the Pope” (Peter Vree, the New Oxford Review).
Marcial Maciel was the most famous priest of all times and places. But here’s some context: the Twentieth Century saw a rash (or lesion) of secretive and infantilizing Vatican-tied “experiments in religious life,” among them:
- The Oblates of the Virgin Mary (headed by Br./Rev./Don Luigi “Gino” Burresi)
- Miles Jesu (Iesu) (codename for Militant Sons and Daughters of the Immaculate Heart of Our Lady of the Epiphany; Rev. Alfonso María Durán)
- The Legion of Christ (originally “The Missionaries of the Sacred Heart and Our Lady of Sorrows”; Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado
- Opus Dei (“The Work of God”; Rev. Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer y Albás)?
- The Community of the Beatitudes (originally the “Community of the Lion of Judah and the Slain Lamb”; Gérard “Brother Ephraim” Croissant)
- The Community of St. John (Marie-Dominique Philippe)
Needless to say, the common Catholic had no idea what had hit him.
Yet the parallels between these shenanigans and such men as Johann Georg Faust (1480-1540) and Edward Alexander “Aleister” Crowley (1875-1947) suggest those who rule the Roman Papal City-State of the Vatican probably perfunctorily practice sorcery (and then some), as Svali’s testimony would suggest. Further data to corroborate this include its recent ecumenist-interreligionist documents (Lumen Gentium et al.) since the Second Vatican Council and the (to some) alarming ecumenist-interreligionist-globalist tenor of the papacies thenceforth. Anyway, the historical Masonic-type figures I name (as well as Carl Gustav Jung, Swiss psychiatrist) vocally touted Rosicrucianesque “Monastic” licentiousness and wizardry (the “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law” of the Renaissance Dominican monastic priest Francesco Colonna [1433-1527] and the Franciscan monk François Rabelais [1494-1553] also contained in Aleister Crowley’s Book of the Law [or Liber Oz], sodomizing and mentally manipulating their followers, almost exactly as these Twentieth-Century* “religious founders” are becoming renowned for doing.
“The three forms of initiation—individual, group, or universal—all lead to conscious or unconscious control by a central power, who in some mysterious way makes its influence felt; often clairvoyantly and clairaudiently seen and heard, but never physically present or visible. The system in all three is the same—cabalistic. Secretly here and there individuals are prepared; these again form groups or centers from which influences spread until they form a network covering the entire world. Like rays from a hidden sun these groups are apparently divergent and detached, but in reality all issue from the same central body. The system is seen to be an insidious and secret dissemination of ideas, orienting and breaking down all barriers of family, religion, morality, nationality, and all self-initiative thought, always under the cloak of a new and more modern religion, new thought, new morality, a new heaven and a new earth; until it evolves a gigantic robot merely answering to the will and commands of a secret Mastermind. They dream they are free, original, self-determining individuals; they are but the negative moon reflecting and reproducing the light from the same hidden and cabalistic Sun. It is called ‘regeneration’ by the Illuminati; it is in truth individual death and disintegration, followed by a resurrection as negative ‘light-bearers’ of this cabalistic dark Sun whose Luciferian ‘Grand Plan’ is world domination” (Inquire Within, Light-Bearers of Darkness, p105). ↗ Notes about the Illuminati
Note: to cancel a vow—particularly one made to an unworthy institution or under dubious circumstances (such as deceitfulness or opacity [i.e. secretiveness])—all that is required is full, free and willing renunciation of the organization in question, and an attempt to notify their head honcho…and whoosh! Out of your life!
Full documents from ExLCEsp.com and WikiLeaks.org:
En español: documental chileno
A recent story concerning a widow:
RI RULING MEANS RELEASE OF LC DOCS
By David Klepper
Associated Press / February 14, 2013
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — Documents related to a disgraced Roman Catholic organization called the Legion of Christ could soon be unsealed and available to the public following a decision Thursday by the Rhode Island Supreme Court.
The state’s high court issued an order declining to delay the release of the sealed documents, which are related to a lawsuit contesting the will of a woman who left $60 million to the Legion. The Legion had argued that the records should remain under court seal because their contents could taint a future jury.
The documents could be available as early as Friday.
The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Providence Journal and the National Catholic Reporter had asked a Superior Court judge to unseal the documents, saying there was no justification to withhold documents that could shed light on the Legion’s operations. Last month, the judge ordered the documents to be unsealed, but he gave the Legion until Friday to ask the Supreme Court to intervene.
Depending on how the documents are stored, some could be available Friday, according to Joseph Cavanagh, the attorney for the media organizations.
‘‘Our issue is to find out exactly what records are there and in what format,’’ he said.
In a statement, the Legion said it was ‘‘disappointed’’ that the documents are being unsealed. Legion spokesman Jim Fair said the Legion wouldn’t fight to keep them under seal any further.
‘‘There are yards of documents,’’ Fair said. ‘‘It’s done. They’re public. This ends the debate.’’
The Legion, founded in Mexico City in 1941, calls itself a religious congregation of pontifical right and says its mission involves ‘‘extending the Kingdom of Christ in society,’’ according to its website. The Vatican took over the Legion in 2010 after determining that its late founder, the Rev. Marcial Maciel, had sexually molested seminarians and fathered three children by two women.
The Legion, which has facilities in Rhode Island, has faced other complaints, including one from a Connecticut man who claims to be Maciel’s son. Another Connecticut man has alleged the Legion used predatory means to persuade his ailing father to hand over hundreds of thousands of dollars, but the Legion says it doesn’t pressure anyone to make a contribution.
The will of Gabrielle Mee, who died in 2008, is the focus of the current case. Mee’s niece Mary Lou Dauray had sought to challenge the will, saying Mee had been defrauded by the Legion into leaving it her fortune. The judge last year threw out the challenge because he determined the niece lacked standing, and her attorney plans to appeal.
Dauray’s attorney, Bernard Jackvony, also had sought the documents’ release. He said the documents, compiled in the course of the lawsuit and sealed by a probate court judge in 2009, contain information about the Legion that isn’t known by the public.
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know” (John Fitzgerald Kennedy, address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, 27 April 1961).
* All this holds very true for the Hollywood élite, obviously.