OK BOOMER: BIBLE STUDY EDITION

⚠️
The following is a public service announcement on the Rapture rabbit hole (known to many through the Left Behind franchise), the lately ridiculed Dispensationalist eschatology, and Christian Zionism generally.
⚠️

❶ WHAT IS THIS SLICK AND SLITHERING RAPTURE DOCTRINE? (see Matthew 24:37, John 3:19)
The Rapture (i.e. pre-apocalyptic [“premillennial”] disappearance and invisible assumption [i.e. “taking up into heaven”] of the heaven-eligible [eligibility here being very questionably defined and the apocalyptic event not bearing even the remotest resemblance to the Days of Noah and thusly directly contradicting the ever-life-giving words of Jesus, red-flaggingly enough) is a central teaching of Dispensationalist theology (not to be confused with the Historical or even Protestant Christian Faith) that originates among the Plymouth Brethren of Dublin, Ireland (a sect that started in the 1800s [so roughly contemporary with Joseph Smith and harem] and is not to be confused with, being entirely unrelated to [though every bit as cliquish and weird as], the Calvinist or Puritan Pilgrims at Plymouth Rock of present-day Massachusetts] and whose most famous member in history is Aliester Crowley).

❷ IS DIPENSATIONALISM FROM HEAVEN OR OF MEN? (see Luke 20:4)
Dispensationalism refers to the flagrantly counter-Biblical theology (which is presumably why distributing the “Reference Bible” was so important for them to terminate any authentic Biblical reading comprehension) that has been scripted very subtly to weaken the Christian layman’s mind to groom it to accept a method whereby MAN can superimpose his MAN-made beliefs over and above God’s Word by cherry-picking which verses they apply to Jews and which verses apply to Christians (basically a step beyond those shameless eisegetes who already cherry-picked which verses to interpret literally versus metaphorically).

❸ HOW DOES THE DISPENSATIONALIST DENY JESUS BEFORE MEN? (see Matthew 10:33)
Needless to say Dispensationalism’s core premise is one of flesh-pride and its appeal is to those who (perhaps understandably in times of prosperity but still completely against the teachings of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in the Gospel) would prefer not to assume their own crosses or face persecution because they have become weak and tragically fail to trust in Jesus to never give them more than they can handle and to be with them always as he said (also deliberately avoiding answering any questions concerning the timing of the restoration of Israel clearly showing that this is not for the disciples of Jesus to be concerning themselves with)!

❹ WHO ARE THESE DISPENSATIONALISTS AND HOW DO THEY OPERATE? (see Matthew 7:18)
The Reference Bible of the non-doctor Scofield was written and financed by perfidious/Antichrist Jews and serial divorcé con men (the quack Scofield himself was the latter) who merely posed as Christian ministers in more sparsely populated or frontier areas (the British Isles, New England, and even Dixieland were having none of it which is why they eventually made Dallas Theological Seminary their Pharisaical-hypocritical nesting place from which they were able to churn out “real doktors” (whose blanket exclusion of African-Americans just about outlasted that of the LDS [a.k.a. Mormons] just for comparison) went on to infect or infest the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement and other more rustic and loosely structured Christian communities, filling the gaps in their thinking with entirely anti-Biblical doctrines).

❺ HOW HAVE DISPENSATIONALISTS GOTTEN BELIEVERS SO FAR OFF-TRACK? (see John 10:10)
Dispensationalist carpetbag-ministers (such soulless con men as John Hagee, David Jeremiah, and the rest—most of whom have made false predictions to boot!) have been in the habit of droning on endlessly about their convoluted reading of cryptic Biblical prophecy (note that often Prosperity Gospel satans swindle these same fluoridated, low-information, and highly cognitive dissonance–prone audiences) to help the itchy ear (itself actually a sign of the end times [or at least the end stage of a civilization] ironically) to forget all about the concrete commandments of Jesus (“under grace” is a key watchword with these sketchy charlatans), to deftly misdirect them away from how brazenly these demon-possessed pulpit fiends violate Jesus’s teaching on divorce and the cross lifestyle of love, humble service, and sacrificial self-denial, all of these being clearly foundational to actual (!) discipleship.

❻ “IF THIS COUNSEL OR THIS WORK BE OF MEN IT WILL COME TO NAUGHT” (Acts 5:38b)
Interestingly the clear pattern across both Christian Zionism and Jewish Nationalism itself (note that there are more Christian Zionists in the USA than there are Jews in the world, neurotically enough) is that BOTH ARE OPENLY DOCTRINES OF MEN rooted in the occult or esoteria (whether that be SwedenBORGian [such as in Charles Larkin’s Dispensational Truth] or plain old Qabbalah) and that their century of tyranny over the mind of the immature “Christian” is almost over—praise Jesus!

Recent “critics” (i.e. describers) of Dispensationalist theology:

Here is the article referenced by Weir in the video above.

Here is an article by a Roman Catholic commenting on the death of Dispenationalism which I think interesting considering Dispensationalists had thought to make Jerusalem some kind of Judeo-Masonic Vatican. (Per Pastor Rick Wiles of TruNews and Flowing Streams Church, proto-Israeli Zionists would perform Freemasonic/occult rituals in the tunnels beneath the Temple Mount/Zion.)

Lastly, not only are Dispensationalists obviously demoniacally gaslighting us about what a Jew is (being fundamentally Freemasons as they are), but even most so-called Jews exhibit a more Talmudic versus Torahic idea that has similarly confused Christians into contravening the words of Jesus!

IS “REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY” REALLY THE HISTORICALLY CATHOLIC POSITION?

I was just listening to a lecture by a Franciscan friar (OFM, linked below) in which he states that the Catholic Church before Francis of Assisi had always taken the Acts and the epistles—not the gospels—as the rule for church and monastery life. Furthermore the bibles that John Nelson Darby favored were from among the more “Catholic” (or at any rate “catholic” in the sense of “high-church”) ones while a heavily footnoted King James Bible ended up being used only because the Dispensationalist proselytizers knew the United States wouldn’t accept anything taught directly out of some abominable “popish” translation of the Bible. Then again if you let them talk long enough Dispensationalists think to replace the divine right of kings with that of self-identified Jews (or rather the Zionists among them, most prominently Ashkenazim), to make Jerusalem their Vatican: yet another lie to add to the list?

Roman Catholic influencer Patrick Coffin’s videos on Dispensationalism: part 1, part 2