About johnpfmcguire

Has not yet been declassified, unfortunately.

Jesus as Jewbermensch



In my last post I dealt with the heresy that you can’t amount to what Jesus did, which blatantly contradicts some of Jesus’s most frequent maxims. In this post I’m going to survey how we got our view of Jesus in a (for me) down-to-earth historical survey.

Most Christians now insist that Jesus was human and divine, a God-man, the God-man, the Son and Heir of God the Father–even though in the gospels and epistles there’s ample empowerment for the hearer to follow Jesus and become himself truly Another Jesus (summarized in my last blog post). Now in all of this both humanity and divinity are supposedly understood in a Hebreocentric (as opposed to Hellenized) sense.


Note the many Moses-Satan parallels

But I can remember reading somewhere that most modern Jews (90% are technically Ashkenazim not Hebrews) have a prodigious index of schizophrenia. What if we asked ourselves why the Graeco-Roman world really took to this arch-Jewish figure whom they call Jesus and Christ? Well, for starters, Judaism is a unique holdover from Egyptian ways of life. That is why I’m going to call Egypt the X-factor of Europa.


The Pharaohate of Kemet fell in 30 BC(E) when a woman was Pharaoh, Cleopatra VII [1] Philopator [2]. Graeco-Roman civilization has often revered its Egyptian roots and by association Temple Judaism, as we see in Freemasonry. [3] Alexander the Great wasn’t too great to seek his destined arch-divinity in spiritually fertile Egypt [4].

And thus, Egypt is the root of the Graeco-Roman world, remembered for its stable society, a father of nations, though the stronger sons tended to differ more widely than the weaker sons. But even the strong sons turn instinctively back to Egypt in times of empire and cultural decline.

The Jews uniquely, due to their frequent “exiles” (and/or perhaps causing them) kept clinging to Egyptian ways more tightly in many ways than most did, with the latter availing themselves of prosperity (and a more verdant natural environment) to forge their own identity.

The phenomenon of God-men or Übermenschen, therefore, was the Jews’ frequent visitor, a phenomenon which again we now stigmatize as schizophrenic, which is why (unlike say Korea) we don’t get too many Übermensch types rising to a level of popularity where they could threaten the power structure’s monopoly on the workman’s mind again.

And on those rare occasions when the “Jesus neurology” does crop up, our bureaucratic religious “fathers” can simply play their Christological exceptionalism card and tell the young rebel confidently that the Savior already came and what they’ve got going on must certainly be pride, demons or indeed schizophrenia–depending on the subculture and the times.

As a matter of fact, the Greek term barbarian seems to have begun as an antisemitic slur, with bar (“of”) being among the most frequently occurring words in the Hebrew tongue. The creed on which Christendom settled was that God is one (as in Judaism), but also three (as in Hinduism), but Jesus Christ is definitely just one, full stop.

This helped me understand how Europa could revere Jesus (and his early Jewish entourage) while fearing and hating all the rest of the Jews, and this is why Jews don’t need Jesus despite Europa’s insistence: the Jewish people are lousy with Jesus types–they get at least one messiah every century! Our kings went to great lengths to keep us apart from that people set apart, since of course the latter’s culture (with its Kabbalah center) could handily dilute and dispel those doctrines that underpin ultimately the authority of those other foreigners of the house of Caesar, the crowned heads of Europa. Of course today, in lieu of the Divine Right of Kings, as I’ve argued elsewhere, we have the Chosen People doctrine designed to silence the common objector.

But whatever else may change, the thief will never let the gentleman alone, and the occultist will never let the religionist sleep soundly either.

[1] Speaking of fatal 7ths, Ferdinand VII was King of Spain during the French purchase of “New Spain” [Mexico-ish] and the Mexican War of Independence.
[2] Meaning that she was devoted to her father.
[3] Note: Saint Peter’s Basilica features what are known as Solomonic columns.
[4] “Alexander advanced on Egypt in later 332 BC, where he was regarded as a liberator. He was pronounced son of the deity Amun at the Oracle of Siwa Oasis in the Libyan desert. Henceforth, Alexander often referred to Zeus-Ammon as his true father, and after his death, currency depicted him adorned with the horns of a ram as a symbol of his divinity” (Wikipedia citing Ring, Bosworth et al., and Dahmen).


Real leaders create other leaders


“Leaders don’t create followers. Leaders create other leaders” (Tom Peters, co-author of In Search of Excellence).

Atypically serious leader that he was, Jesus is notorious for compulsively stressing that his disciples were in the running to be as super-powerful and as violently hated as he the master was. Yet from Paul on, the prevailing community of “Christians”, a growing Greek majority, is one that adopts an earlier and more comfortable religious framework and adapts Jesus, fashioning unto themselves a more sapiential, White and far less prophetic rendering of that disturbing radical.


The Holy Radical who radicalized the multitudes!

A striking example of this reheathenization process is when “Saint” Peter, known to have denied and grossly misapprehended Jesus, refuses to undergo an identical manner of death to his master, indeed choosing the opposite. Gospel observance has only deteriorated from there, following the sad example of the first disciples–particularly, I note, those whom the canonical Gospels seem to be at pains to heap praise upon.


All of this establishes a pattern and a spirit of contravention of Jesus’s oft-repeated command that no one should account himself as linked to him unless his clear goal be the privation of all society’s esteem and comforts–and in Peter’s defense it seems that he may have had this in mind.

Radical Sayings

As Jesus said, you must first stop calling your priest father and alter Christus: either you are one yourself or you are no disciple–ergo, no Christian! The only “apostolic succession” Jesus lends any credibility to is one of flagrant disregard for the established clerical order. Anarchist that he is, the prophet follows his heart which prizes the spirit of the law and the inner hierarchy, because the heartless flesh tends to value money, power and ceremony, which are so many illusions that fuel delusion.


But as I survey the history, it looks to me as if they got him back by parceling his life over a liturgical calendar, thus rendering it unrecognizable, unintelligible and especially uninspiring. And then they stress the role of Mary as if to say: “You just submit–pray, pay and obey–and leave the Jesus stuff to us.” (The dazzling style of Louis de Montfort comes to mind.)


Now after reading this, just you go ahead and do as you will, but don’t you dare ask me why the same people who live by such blatant hypocrisy as this are fondling your sons behind that sacristy door, though no more than every other pillar of society you so vainly trust. The conscious being that you are knows full well there is zero value to being so cozy in this profoundly sick Babylon culture, that you ought to stop “worshiping” Jesus and become like Jesus, that your only salvation is transformation–and if you’re transformed, you’ll damn-sure transform the world around you.

We Need to Talk About Law

Those who take all statutes to be just, are as mindless as those who say all laws are criminal.

Both the conformist and the contrarian are bad actors because they are tethered to a random or sordid list of commands which naturally mixes justice (for credibility) with meddling (for profit), like how today’s coins are plated with shiny metals but are trash on the inside.

(What is more, most regimes are selective about which laws/statutes they enforce or criminalize – and on which peons [such as ethnic minorities].)

This produces the illusion of marijuana (before 1933 it was alcohol) as a “gateway drug” to other (Pinkerton/OSS/CIA) “controlled substances”: once you violate an arbitrary or race-baiting prohibition, the first temptation to which the institutionalized/infantilized mind falls prey is to assume that all rules are “made to be broken”. This inhuman mass mind game assures greedy industrialists a steady supply of simple-minded inmates to work literally for peanuts.

This obviously delusional and destructive mindset, that is the criminal mindset, was the cornerstone of the Judeo-Christian sect the Sabbateans or Frankists, forerunners to Rasputin and Crowley, coordinated destroyers of the last autonomous nations of the Western world. Now many who would not serve the national monarch have ended by slaving for the central banks.

But some rules you cannot break – rather they break you – because they’re written in stone and in the heart. The key to success, ultimately, is having your own inner system with its own hierarchy, and the key to developing an inner life is SILENCE.

Demolishing the wall


Allow me to address this “e-wall-ution” (er, no it’s not!) that we’ve been seeing lately.

What I think many brainwashed–er, “patriotic”–“Americans” don’t understand (can’t understand?) about Trump’s “wall talk” is that, as absurd as it is on so many obvious levels, it also promises to sap any vestigial meaning out of the expression “United States of America”, since what that appellation communicates is a long hoped-for confederation of sovereign nation-states comprehending the entire Western Hemisphere, though obviously few today consider it from that cool-headed a perspective, especially since the United States are effectively one State (since the deified Lincoln) and a bank-owned Corporation (since Wilson).

(Let’s take a moment to wonder, had Lincoln lived to retire, what regrets he too would have expressed as Wilson did?)

This of course bolsters the perception that Trump’s presidency is really the end of the US’s international credibility with any nation-state other than Israel, which as we all know is an apartheid police state with no fewer than sixty-five separate anti-Arab laws currently in force.


Of Fathers and Gods

‘The great unmentionable evil at the center of our culture is monotheism’
(Gore Vidal).

I recently let the thought sink in that my father and I had not really bonded, that neither had he and his father, and that this had produced unilateral, dogmatic thinking. A cosmic miracle followed from this personal miracle. As I was reflecting the other day on the Gnostic arch-mythos, to my amazement I started inferring all these family values, such as the truth that in true love there is no need to impress or that a boy really does need his father to spare him abysmal confusion. At that moment it dawned on me that Western theology is woefully inauthentic, and I do mean all of it, and I do mean fundamentally. It is the terminology of bad fathering. GIGO! If it is true that Sophia–which is Divine Wisdom–has inhabited the most beautiful feminine forms through the ages in an effort to correct her mistake, then it is clear that the end-goal of every life, as different as they may be, is perfect centering peace, and this is the inseparable sister of self-affirmation.

‘The wise should surrender speech in mind, mind in the knowing self, the knowing self in the Spirit of the universe, and the Spirit of the universe in the Spirit of peace’
(Maitri Upanishad).

If, as Gore Vidal wrote, ‘the great unmentionable evil at the center of our culture is monotheism’ (or its creator dualism), then certainly the esoteric perspective on religion (and latent within it) is the answer to our issues, particularly our father issues, which is of course the father of our issues. Is it any wonder that Freud, like the Gnostic reformers of old, drew so heavily from classical mythology, demonology and personal eschatology? Contrary to what we’re told by our ‘leaders’ (who remember were abused if not tortured as children), mythology is psychology, and fairy tales are (as Einstein pointed out) the key ingredient in intelligence. Do not settle for the downer of outer-focused religionism, which is simply a corruption of spirituality, a treasure we can regain with the aid of the Mother of the Demiurge* to whom he must answer!





Image result for pharaoh eyes


Neter-khertet, heart of the Earth

Note the resemblance of the vesica piscis (Latin for ‘fish bladder’) not only to the mandorla (Italian for ‘almond’, the classic sacred feminine form) but also to the Paleo-Christian ichthus (Greek for ‘fish’). Jesus, the son of her whose name means ‘Rebel’, chose fishermen first and foremost.

Every religion forbids to the layman that which gives the clergyman his power. You cannot likely achieve liberation or fulfillment without at some point seeing through this ruse.

Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, claimed that a man’s prime drive is to murder his father and marry his mother. Yoda, the patron saint of untrain.org, told Luke he had to confront Vader to become a Jedi. Paul wrote: “Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed from sin” (Romans 6:6). Nietzsche wrote: “The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his eyes. ‘Whither is God?’ he cried; ‘I will tell you. We have killed him–you and I'”. This indubitably was in response to (imperial) Christianity (Protestant and Catholic equally perhaps)’s infantilizing impetus.

Like Freud, the Gnostics were immersed in myth, and certainly their aim is defeating the creator’s egoism and exalting Sophia, but it’s also discovering the feminine within, which is what the mature man is secure enough to do, sometimes represented by pink shirts.

* From The Golden Compass (note: demiurge means ‘common worker’ or simply ‘laborer’):


Einstein the dreamer (and schemer?)



All it takes to impress Americans at a gathering is something like Leonardo da Vinci was ahead of his time. But when it comes to Albert Einstein, it sometimes looks as if he was smack-dab in the middle of his time.

    Quit calling me a scientist!
    The German-Jew-American Albert Einstein felt that he was intellectually inferior to the Serbian-American Nikola Tesla. What follows is what was said and possible reasons why, reasons that will overturn everything (yes, literally everything) you’ve been conditioned to think about the world. When asked how it felt to be the smartest man alive, Einstein set the softball ‘reporter’ straight: ‘I don’t know. You’ll have to ask Tesla’. In a letter sent on the occasion of the latter’s seventy-fifth birthday, Einstein wrote: ‘As an eminent pioneer in the realm of high frequency currents’ ‘I congratulate you on the great successes of your life’s work’. But if observable fact favored Tesla, today’s tyranny over the mind of man favors Enstein, and I’ll leave it to your darkest imaginings to piece together the reasons for this state of affairs.

    • So what did Tesla think of Einstein?
      Nikola Tesla agreed with ‘the Dopey Doctor’s assessment of which man had the better mind, not only because of their differences of ideology but because of their differences of methodology!

      • Difference of opinions. Tesla followed the great Giovanni Cassini (Newton’s rival, who unlike the Masonic knight got a space probe named after him) and persevered in holding aether over relativity, stationary geocentrism over modern astronomy [0], and electromagnetism over spacetime; he categorically rejected such Einsteinian notions as ‘curved space’! [1]
      • Difference of method. Not only did Tesla agree that Einstein wasn’t the smartest man alive: he highlighted reasons why his fellow-immigrant wasn’t a scientist, full stop. Without saying it outright, Tesla warned that Einstein had started a cult with a wanton wackiness and a suspectness that mirrored the man’s personal appearance (and let’s just say it: his sexual conduct, which–paging Doctor Freud–would seem to explain his predilection for ‘relativity’. ‘Einstein’s relativity [2] work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists’ (Nikola Tesla [underlines added]. I know what you’re thinking: when it comes to punctuation, the jury’s still out on which man was worse)! To reword his last remark, relativity theorists are just that: theorists, speculative and not empirical-evidence-based. This helps explain why Einsteinians rely almost entirely on mathematics and speak endlessly of the ‘beauty’ of the theory as a Muslim might peddle the Qur’an or a Seventh-day Adventist might advocate for the King James Version of the Hebreo-Christian Bible. When metaphysics masquerades as physics, circular reasoning is right around the corner. (See also the ‘science’ of sociology.)

        (Please note here that philosophies, religions, superstitions and intuitive enterprises, while it’s disingenuous to confuse them with science, can on the other hand be credited with having incubated much inspiration and indeed birthed many inventions. I believe it was C.S. Lewis who pointed out that technology is to science what magic is to religion.)
  • So what had Einstein to say for himself?
    To this blogger’s shock, it turns out that Albert Einstein himself made no claims that could warrant Tesla’s diatribe. What happened with him, as with many edgy personalities (Jesus?), is that the cult wasn’t really Einstein’s idea. Early in his life, Einstein essentially disclaimed that he was nor aspired to be a scientist: ‘I want to know how God created this world. I’m not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His [God’s] thoughts, the rest are details’ (AE).

We all know from science that nothing can exceed the speed of light, but relatively it’s happening constantly! The only real question is why we call Einstein a ‘scientist’, unless this is some kind of Yiddish Special Olympics and I wasn’t informed.


  • Blogger’s fun physics notes.
    Relativity has been disproved. And it’s little wonder, quite frankly. The problems this blogger sees in spacetime relativity are literally endless, such that when he envisions Einstein’s mind he conjures the image of a burrowing mole. So here for your consideration are what this blogger considers to be super-obvious reasons why Einstein should never be taken seriously as a physical scientist:

    • Were space and time relative and continual–if time was a ‘fourth dimension’–then it would be possible to move back in time which would create paradoxes that would negate the motive for having traveled back in time to begin with, thus creating an endless loop of nothingness, à la Donny Darko. But more importantly,
    • the speed of light would be relative to the source of light and would therefore be limitless, which no one has even attempted to claim, and therefore the conversion of matter into energy at said speed (E=mc²) would of necessity rely on a collision of some kind. (Spoiler alert: the collision is with aether!) And finally,
    • were spatial relativity realistic (never mind observable), there could be no orbits (as of satellites, moons and ‘planet-stars’), since neither rotations nor revolutions can be said to happen in relative space (in which furthermore it would also be impossible to say that anything moves except relative to something else, so you have a stationary Earth either way!

And this coming from a man who lucked out by being in the U.S. when Adolf Hitler won the chancellerian election!

The real reason media-led ‘pop culture’ hails Einstein as a ‘scientist’ is because he champions not science but scientism. What I mean is that his sloppy plagiarized formula is the last thing standing between us and the truth of a geocentric universe (see last video).



    • The man who would be philosopher-king of the Jews
      Critiquing one’s own family, tribe or nationality can be delicate (by which I really mean ‘indelicate’). Albert Einstein was quick to praise what good he found in his Judaism-based upbringing and in his fellow-Jews but he kept no secrets (hint, hint) about what he found to be deeply disturbing, manifestly maladjusted, unequivocally unjust and spiritually stunting in Jewish nationalism [3], namely their attitudes and policies of secrecy, superiority and supremacy. Nor did he make any secret of his opinion that, when it came to transcendence, there were far better paths available! (For Einstein’s intellectual successor, see also Jewish genocide survivor Hajo Meyer.)
    • B-1
      We Jews really need to get our sh*t together!
      Albert Einstein (like almost any other genius you can name) profoundly sympathized with and sought to candidly address ‘antisemitism’.
      ‘Anti-Semitism [sic] is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in non-Jews by the Jewish group [or demographic]. This is a normal social reaction’ (AE).
      Specifically, Einstein thought the Talmud was awesome but had to be made public (and by the way this blogger agrees on both points [5]): ‘The scientific organization and comprehensive exposition in accessible form of the Talmud has a twofold importance for us Jews. It is important in the first place that the high cultural values of the Talmud should not be lost to modern minds among the Jewish people nor to science, but should operate further as a living force. In the second place, the Talmud must be made an open book to the world, in order to cut the ground from under certain malevolent attacks, of anti-Semitic [sic] origin, which borrow countenance from the obscurity and inaccessibility of certain passages in the Talmud’ (AE [underlines added], who as we’ll see doesn’t believe in a personal or separate God, as well as having had a fascinating family life).
    • B-2
      Israel’s (systemic) racism is shockingly hypocritical and regressive!
      Albert Einstein refused to accept presidency of Israel, warning that Zionists were becoming Nazis vis-à-vis the Palestinians (and quite possibly asking himself why on Earth the powers that be had scrapped earlier cool-headed plans and opted to settle Jews in Arab Central rather than in sparsely populated Argentina, Uganda, Madagascar or at the very least in the Jewish Autonomous Oblast).
      ‘The most important aspect of [Israeli] policy must be our ever-present, manifest desire to institute complete equality for the Arab citizens living in our midst.’ ‘The attitude we adopt toward the Arab minority will provide the real test of our moral standards as a people’ (AE). And ominously, ‘It would be my greatest sadness to see Zionists do to Palestinian Arabs much of what Nazis did to Jews’ (AE). Sure enough, the Jewish Democratic State of Israel today (29-Nov-2017) has sixty Arab-hating laws on the books, affecting virtually all areas of public life within its ever-expanding borders, like a gangrene of the Middle East. (Contrast with Palestine which has zero systemic racism and has a Christian diplomat.) In the area of civil rights, Tel Aviv basically makes Johannesburg look like London.
    • B-3
      Personal gods are for kids; national gods are for savages!
      Albert Einstein rejected a personal or separate deity as the true God: ‘The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend a personal God and avoid dogmas and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. If there is any religion that would cope with modern scientific needs, it would be Buddhism’ (AE?). Einstein used terms like naïve and childlike in reference to the whole notion of a personal or separate deity, preferring ‘religious unbelief’ and instead a Baruch-Spinoza-styled ‘pantheism’, which today would be simply termed panentheism. Einstein was a total Buju.
      In short, the only path Einstein saw for world Jewry was to allow their culture to become truly enlightened, rather than act as the Western world’s eclipse by coasting on the advances made in the Enlightenment for thuggish ends. (For counterpoint, see Star Trek.) But here let’s be fair and point out that the Judeo-Masonic Bavarian Illuminati, who too colluded with the Rothschild bankers (as well as Jacob Frank!) and whose saga reads like The Lord of the Rings. The Illuminati (d.b.a. ‘Free and Accepted Masons’) have had a clear corrupting influence on the Enlightenment and on the Zionist movement. Long before Jews gained equality anywhere on the European continent, the Illuminati similarly refused to publish their ideology and methodology even where persecution by church authorities was nil, opting for élitism, much to Thomas Jefferson’s consternation.

In conclusion, Einstein really wasn’t who we were told, but he was still a total rock star of profundity! Oh, and please understand that I’m not being patronizing when I call him a true genius and cultural luminary as well as icon. As a 90s Catholic kid, I was treated to this and that Italo-American Catholic evangelist (nationalist?) plagiarizing Einstein’s sayings right and left with nary a scruple. One of the late great Mother Angelica [4]’s most iconic ‘sayings’ concerned ‘what God thinks’, and the ex-priest John Anthony Corapi could rouse a crowd with his standard ‘God has placed clear limits on Man’s intelligence, but none on his stupidity’–to whose veracity their own popularity is maybe a case in point!

[0] You’ll find that aether does necessitate geocentrism: see the Michelson-Morley Experiment.
[1] Concerning space, Tesla said: ‘I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view’ (underline added). Note: neither Tesla nor Einstein has a middle name.
[2] This blogger found it fascinating to learn that Einstein’s theory was translated into English by none other than Satyendra Nath Bose of India (no relation to the Bose Wave Radio man, though both hail from Bengal, specifically Calcutta). Especially since the boson in Higgs boson (the new name for ‘aether‘?) actually derives from this very Bose.
[3] Jewish nationalism includes both classical Judaism and Europe-based Zionism.
[4] My favorite words from the Talmud express the Golden Rule or Law of Reciprocity which, like all the key points of Judaism, actually comes from Egypt:

דעלך סני לחברך לא תעביד. זו היא כל התורה כולה, ואידך פירושה הוא: זיל גמור
That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor.
That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation. Go and study it’
(Babylonian Talmud, tractate Shabbat 31a).

[5] Full name: Mother Mary Angelica of the Annunciation, PCPA (born Rita Antoinette Rizzo).


And then there’s super-science?