God is spirit (not matter)!

or God is a mystical not a scientific term

Call me Irish-minded all you want. But in all practicality there are at least five terminal reasons why the existence of God will never be proved (or disproved!) following the rules* that are currently in force among the corporate state-sponsored ‘scientific community’**, ensuring that this formally unanswerable (and for at least this reason fundamentally pointless) riddle will be forever trolled about long after we’re all (mercifully) deceased:

  1. No one knows what would constitute proof of ‘God’, probably because
  2. ‘God’ cannot be defined (which alone is problem enough!),
  3. ‘God’ cannot be sensed (which alone is problem enough!), and
  4. ‘God’ cannot be conceptualized (which alone is problem enough!)—and
  5. Technically in most monotheistic theologies ‘God’ does not ex-sist (which means ‘to emerge’) but rather sub-sists (or simply put is in and of ‘Godself’ and independent of any relationship, though often described as present in all beings, comparable then to the Brahman or Spirit Supreme of the Vedas and the Upanishads).

So it seems to be God’s élitism—God’s ‘gnostic-ness’—more than God’s improbability that so offends the crypto-clerics of scientism, most of whom are still stuck on the very dead Newton, Darwin and Einstein who indulge their own sensibilities, or rather whom they interpret in such a way that does (much the way Christians interpret the Bible in a way that seems suspiciously well tailored to their own ego and the political ambitions thereof).

Nonetheless, there are plenty of mysteries that go unexplained (and often seem unexplainable, again always assuming we’re working within the rules* that are currently in force among the corporate state-sponsored ‘scientific community’**), and whether you want to term all those gaps God, magic, aliens or the Jack of Diamonds makes no difference whatsoever in the final outcome.

Where scientists screw themselves the worst is where they refuse to acknowledge findings that don’t fit their narrative and even seem to give the Bible a leg up, such as massive giant bones (whether in Ohio or Peru, take your pick)! In this sense, scientists must take the blame for the Christian fundamentalist fanaticism, because the governments who pay them to keep it zipped won’t be around tomorrow to pick up the pieces of a radicalized humanity.

Conclusion: Just tell the truth for a change, and end these insipid authority games.

Afterthought: It does no good positing God as that which created/emanated/sustains the visible (and invisible) world(s) without describing, at least to the satisfaction of one’s contemporaries, how God created/emanated/sustains ‘it all’…and no fair just dumping on our laps the need to experience this inwardly, since even though I know that to be the case, if you’re not going to endeavor to lead others thither, better by far to keep silence!

* Not to criticize said rules, but let’s just state the obvious that they are soundly outmoded and probably based on a bias toward democratic, horizontal and heaven knows Judeo-Masonic ideologies in the first place.
** At least the side of the ‘scientific community’ that you see in school and the media, that is.


“My eerie fundie kinks list”

So the saying goes that we become our enemy, and perhaps nowhere is this displayed quite as dazzlingly as in this disingenuous “anathema” between traditional Muslims and your more fundamentalist or hard-line post-Reformation Christian sects, such as Baptists. So without further ado, here is a comprehensive snapshot of the rather disquieting similarities I witness daily yet I never hear anyone talk about:

  1. Sex-obsessed. Celibacy is frowned upon, probably because of homosexual connotations.
    (In denial about Jesus, who lived his entire life celibate and explained in painstaking detail the nature of eunuchism in Matthew’s Gospel).
  2. Prohibitionists. Alcohol and many other psychoactives are proscribed.
    (In denial about Jesus, whose first miracle was the production of wine and the other prophets who clearly used fasting, liturgy and other psychoactives such as the much-discussed kaneh bosm or cannabis and likely mushrooms to boot).
  3. Chauvinists. Women are elaborately segregated and subordinated. An infantilizing degree of repression is common. Paired with their patriarchy, there is a twin-tendency toward a quite militant patriotism.
  4. “Gleeful pessimists”. Our dearly beloved Fundie brethren tend to use the bulk of their “air time” (or “pulpit time”, of which they receive way too much) in discussing devils, apocalypses, their favorite sins, and what’s allegedly fatally erroneous with other groups and approaches—rather than say the actual Gospel, God’s love and those more freeing and wisdom-inducing passages within the Scriptures they thump. Whether traditional Muslim or fundamentalist Baptist, they teach humanity’s total separation from God (which almost rings true, in that it would handily explain why God would allow Fundies to exist and to troll people, but which also seems to fly in the face of their other teachings, such as the teaching that God is omnipresent—a mystery?). The upshot of their message seems to be to frighten, repress and shelter people—more than to edify, inform or save them.
  5. Literalists. They seem to be markedly obsessed with Genesis—or rather with a distinctly literal (concretely, Augustinian) interpretation of it, despite the poetic and mythical style of the original text and the lack of any teaching on Original Sin, Total Corruption, or anything indicating a stark and total corruption or separation from God in all of historic Judaism. Often their interpretations will differ, but each person’s opinion is always forced (and upon closer inspection opportunistic. “If the light that is in you is darkness…”) Unsurprisingly, loving their inbred thought patterns as they do, our dear Fundie brothers and sisters never have very much to say on subjects of cultural, intellectual and scientific pursuits and advances.
  6. Community autonomy. Local groups tend to operate independently and cling to no central authority. (Hey, who said it was all bad news?)
  7. Iconoclasm. They prohibit—or tell us that “God” prohibits—not only statues but all artistic realism, especially the anthropomorphic, especially their sacred male figures, whether Jesus or Muhammad. (Like icons, the occult is as prohibited as it is misunderstood.)
  8. Rent in twain. Both groups have two large subgroups. Muslims have “Sunnis” and “Shiites”; Baptists have “Southern Baptists” and “Baptists”.
  9. Ubiquity. Both groups’ presence is global and their claims are universal. According to them, they have the truest, purest form of what their hyper-masculine God had initially intended for the world, which they have salvaged from the wreckage of “Babylonian backsliding”. They really, really, really want you on their team (or out of their way).

Notable differences between the groups discussed include:

  1. I versus we. Baptists tend to be more individualistic (“Jesus, my Bible and me”), whilst Islam tends to be more communistic, as it were.
  2. Light hazing. Baptists have baptism (i.e. aquatic immersion), whereas Muslim initiation involves only a verbal profession before the community.
  3. Political Zionism (not to be confused with religious Zionism). Last but not least, Baptists seem far more prone to agree with (or acquiesce to) Jews’ sort of Master Race claims and consequent colonialism (e.g., the allegedly Jewish State of Israel).

(It’s clear from 1 and 3 how a certain uber-rich ethnicity have conspired to play this and many “Christian” sects like a violin, to be frank.)

Join us next week for Mormons: White Muslims?

Jesus, Women and Race



Jesus told the Samaritan woman at Jacob’s Well (a mile on foot from her home city of Sychar) that Salvation is from the Jews. The reason why this is unwieldy for someone who has bothered to read the whole Gospel is because, for one thing, the inspired (i.e. spirited or breathed) New Testament preaches an incorruptible God who is no respecter of persons, which is why Jesus continues: the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father, since spirit and truth have nothing in common with nations or flesh-and-bloodlines. This radical idea that the true God isn’t given to racism or any other partisanship–that there is no Chosen People or destined Master Race–really gives the Golden Rule theological legs, but tragically it is normally the property of what I would call the faith of the mystics, as opposed to the religionists. But this won’t be the last time Moses is indirectly demonized in Christian circles. Consider, for example, the standard credal Christian’s notions about God’s arch-enemy Satan (not to be confused with the real Satan which the Hebrew scriptures characterize as God’s designated Prosecutor):
– Refused to serve his King (see Romans 13)
– Stirred up a rebellion
– Pulled dirty tricks
– Made his own rules
– Never invented anything, just appropriated from his kingdom of origin
– Caused untold bloodshed in his stride
– Ultimately lowered his following’s quality of life
– Had horns
– Healed using a bronze serpent of all things


So then why does Jesus say “Salvation is from the Jews”—the same Jesus who’d told the parables of the Good Samaritan, the Justified Publican and others—even as he’s gearing up to ring in the destruction of the Second Temple and all it stands for, especially legalism? Consider that:
(a) he is talking to a Samaritan woman,
(b) in another passage he casually refers to a Canaanite woman as a “dog” (i.e. “the b-word”),
(c) his own mother he addresses as “woman” (“madam”?).

Today it’s trendy to say Jesus raised the status of women (and that Paul [or rather the author of Timothy] brought the Gospel back down to “practical reality” where “men know best”), yet Jesus is quite the Jewish man in this regard, and the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas hasn’t helped matters either!


But here’s another wrinkle: like many an esotericist, Jesus seems fascinated by generlessness, as his exaltation of children and his elaborate discourse on adult celibacy (doubtless attributable to his Essene background), which he’s careful to clarify is only meant for real adepts not your average “José Six” but that those who can accept the way of the eunuch certainly should do so in the interest of maximizing spiritual productivity, a point the real Paul reinforces even as he seems to repeat the underlying importance of being Zen or indifferent toward one’s carnal state wither married or celibate. This may be why the real Paul ends up saying there are no distinctions of gender, race or status but only a great unity in “Christ Jesus”.

The Kabbalah had an inestimable influence on Christianity’s foundations and those of Western society, and we see later in Europe those who are persecuted for practicing Kabbalah “witchcraft” as modeling purposeful diversity or integration of classes in the Middle Ages, much as Paul’s communities had done in Antiquity.

For the record, I do not assert that the Old Testament is mystically bankrupt. A wild goose chase I’ll grant you. But while the true God, being pure Breath and pure Consciousness, is essentially no respecter of persons, I can see God putting God’s energies into defending the oppressed against the oppressor (so much so that I’m not at all certain Christianity hasn’t called God “Satan”)—it’s just that as soon as the oppressed become oppressors the deal is very much off.

Jesus the universal Galilean

Image may contain: 1 person

Most of US, viewing everything as we do through our campy “Americhristian goggles”, have this ingrained group-aggrandizing habit of thinking it so supremely “mysterious” or “paradoxical” that a seer-healer-teacher from one of the most insular societies in world history would ever gain global appeal. But once you UnTrain™ yourself—really sit Yogi-Berra-style and ponder the geographical and historical reality of Galilee, Samaria and Judea (henceforth simply “Palestine”)—it only stands to reason that “Jesus” would be both Galilean and universal [1]. After all, the Jesus figure seems to have been an Essene [2], an earnest mystic and apparently something a yogi with Zen leanings. Yet it makes perfect sense that such thought patterns would afford him an edge in interpreting the scriptures of the Hebrews. After all, Israelite life and lore from Solomon’s day onward reads like a dazzling hodgepodge of all the imposing civilized cultures of classical antiquity in whose crossroads—and crosshairs—Palestine is situated. See, we’re taught to think of the Hebrews as a people who got some message from the sky—and sure enough dreams, visions and a lot of drugs were likely involved, though with heavy commentary to qualify them—but much of the content of the Pentateuch can be rather easily traced to sources elsewhere on Planet Earth rather than in the aetherial realms where supposedly some Zeus-like “Big Man” (YHWH written vertically is humanoidal in form) is waiting to strike down anyone who challenges a set of laws he gave to a particularly murderous band of desert-fevered barbarians.

We have known since Herodotus in 500 BC [3] that it was from Egypt that the Israelites got phallic circumcision, the characteristic Jewish observance to this day. From India they got the story where Abraham is called upon to sacrifice Isaac (originally named Nachiketa) as well as cow worship which they’ve officially discarded but unofficially cling to. From Canaanite idolatry they got the creator-deity Elohim (whence also Allah). And we haven’t even touched on the Zoroastrian sect of Persia/Iran who bankrolled the Second Temple in Jerusalem and from where the Magi or Wise Men proceeded! In short, classical Judaism, with its Law and Temple, represents a mix of elements from the whole then known world.

And the “Jesus scriptures” (commonly gospels) [4] are a deceptively savvy feat of literature probably composed near the Royal Library of Alexandria (Egypt) by ambitious wordsmiths who probably read a lot of old books, smoked a lot of keneh bosm and managed to satisfy the mythical archetypes and moral sensibilities of Pharisees and Hellenists (i.e. Grecophiles) alike, both among the following of the rabbis and among the members of other cults, whose twilight became increasingly apparent as the ancient classical Roman way of life went to the dogs, taking with it ancient classical Judaism of which mostly only the more portable rabbinical versions [5] survived.

Of course, as the Eastern Empire fell to Islam, the Western Mediterranean, and particularly “Roma Invicta” [6], conspired to continue its role of not only bureaucratic but additionally cultural “nerve center”, with the “Pope” of Rome putting on the dress of a Pharaoh and the titles of a Caesar—even touting as his main claim to authority a forged “Donation of Constantine” for the almost seven centuries between ca. 750 and 1444!
[1] In the lyrics of Michael Card, “He was unlike any other man and yet so much like me”.
[2] Not a Nazarite nor white as popular depictions suggest.
[3] That’s only 100 years after the Davidic-Solomonic kingdom, coinciding with the first-ever recorded accounts of “Israelites” (as opposed to “Canaanites”) anywhere ever.
[4] Whether you choose to stress its quasi-historicity or its quasi-mythicality matters little at this point.
[5] Of the rabbinical Jews some groups of Christians can be considered a subset, particularly Arians (with an i, from Arius), direct ancestor of Muslims but also very much alive in US sects such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses (ironic since self-described “Aryans” [with a y] persecuted Jehovah’s Witnesses in Nazi Germany).
[6] Now reinvented with Egyptian title (“Pope”), headdress (“mitre” [UK] or “miter”) and pageantry.

Let’s pwetend Trump isn’t Hitler!

Image result for member berries

But seriously, a little background as to what in the goddamned fuck is being perpetrated on us through instruments of the elite like Trump et al.: So these self-styled “zealots” have their Bobble (Bible?) gurus who feed them this special seasoning with which they the Neo-Conservative Evangelicals—the same goddamned sect of Evangelicals (not Catholics this time) that aided Hitler’s campaign and earlier Cromwell’s attempted genocide on the Irish—labor day and night over a hot toilet to make the fecal matter that comes out of Trump’s mouth and Twitter account seem palatable—or rather “prophetic”—to a confused, scared, suggestible populace. It’s the same sick dynamic as with the hierarchy-obsessed “Scribes” (interchangeable with “Theologians”) whom Jesus unequivocally condemned, because in reality they are salaried by thug politico monsters like Herod to misrepresent the Scriptures in such a way as to string along the often toddler-minded workmen (who, then as now, were a useful combination of angry and uninformed and could be rallied to push for just about any bullshit agenda you can think of—and some you can’t), to break down any resistance to the flavor-of-the-month bankster-funded criminally insane regime, resistance that is often put up by the sensitive, intelligent, and by now concerned if not alarmed elders and other clear-headed-without-being-sociopaths types of the community.

Image result for saint dogbert

So in summary, yes your instincts were correct: of course Trump is every bit as Satan as he can possibly be, and he steamrolls over all the good sense that’s in our people, but the recipe pans out because he’s bought off the ignoble intellectual lightweights and transparently vain, materialistic spokespeople (in short, actors) like Alex Jones, John Hagee, Kasim Haafez, and an endless Dork Parade™ consisting of frankly most clergy and other “public religionists” at this stage of the game (both the famous and the “famous” in their own minds). They’re all sell-outs. If you want spirituality, you go into the woods, and if you don’t find a monk, you become one (eat or starve)!


Mindfucked reporter from Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now

(And note that these money- and power-crazed automatons always surround themselves, when possible, with an entourage of insecure groupies who defend them against the burning questions of actual thinkers, yet even with this safety measure in place, you can still tell these front men are scared to death of people like you and me who have an idea who’s paying them to troll. For example, they can’t stand anarchists, mystics, or even well-rounded scholars, so all they can do is blindly fling memorized labels at us, usually amounting to the charge that we who question their thug enabling are “apathetic” and/or “unmanly” because we are true prophets in an age of false prophets, standing up for the victim against the oppressor while they do the opposite, challenging the manifestly unjust violence they promote, and they’re basically rubbing themselves “down there” as they think of themselves as part of the rise of the world’s next mass-murderer. It’s a sex drive for these lowlife toadies, make no mistake about it. It’s a harem, and when they find themselves in the presence of a true saint—who is the real person whose role they’re merely playing—they literally shit themselves, and because that kills the mood they instinctively lash out.)

Kirchenwahl.- Propaganda der

The German Evangelical Church, or Reichskirche, was a unified state church of some German Protestant regional churches that espoused a single doctrine compatible with National Socialism.

And it’s no good telling these paid mouthpieces that Israel and Trump are out to destroy the innocent, because they’ll just cover their ears and troll all the louder: “Well, Gawd‘s instruments aren’t perfect, but Gawd‘ll use them as surely as Gawd used Pharaoh, Muhammad, Hitler and the 9/11 demolition team to do Gawd’s perfect will”, whereupon they’ll get away from you as soon as possible, leaving you with your mouth agape before you can make the most obvious point of all as you have your last soul-crushing epiphany:

My God, you guys are cut from exactly the same cloth as the fancy-dressed preachers to whom it was “revealed” that Hitler was chosen by Gawd to save the German people!

How does being “White” make me a “racist”?


Key Disclaimer
In the course of explaining the phenomenon at hand, I do highlight certain factual data (with factual being the operative term here) that partisans of a Nationalist and Socialist variety have also highlighted. However, I also repudiate, denounce and ridicule both Nationalism and Socialism. So calling me anything but a Political Atheist after reading this is as absurd as saying that an alarm clock must be red after having already seen that it is blue, basing your claim on the fact that some older alarm clocks are red. My goal being to educate, such obstructionistic trolling simply will not be tolerated.


Okay, so here’s how the brainwashing–er, government advertising–works. Racist is a term Leon Trotsky (Jewish) coined in the hopes of demonizing people with Nationalist leanings. [1] Communists, as their name implies, believe that there is no Individual [2] but only a “System”, which contrary to Karl Marx (Jewish)’s theories yet in agreement with practical experience generally tends to equate to the “Party” and the “State” (in the sense of “Government”). Furthermore, whereas Marx’s focus had been on the “Means of Production”, there prevails today something I’ll just call Neo-Marxism [3] that obsesses instead on the “Means of Reproduction”, in other words your genetic material, as being their theoretical “Primary Tool of Inequality”, and that was the ideological kernel that has long since flowered into “White Privilege” rhetoric. Of course we can certainly appreciate Trotksy’s influence here in this “It isn’t Racism when we do it” cult-think. [4] Because the Communist fanatics blindly believe everything boils down to the System [5], therefore if there is a Racist System in place [6] then all the members of the race it favors are de facto Racists. No judge, no jury, and especially no critical thinking. That is why those who believe in Neo-Communism take all Whites to be Racists [7], and those who believe in Nationalism obviously take all people, especially themselves, to be Racists. So all of that to explain why most of your more polarized African-Americans seem so prone to call you and/or your White friends things like “Racists” and even “Devils”, because their sell-out and therefore well-funded misleaders have taught them to see the world as Color-Coordinated Groups rather than Individuals. Sad really, though obviously sometimes it actually works the way they think it does, especially among the higher-ups [8]. Of course the goal all along was to fund and script this seemingly well-intentioned “Civil Rights Movement” by means of the Highlander Institute in such a way that strategically sics all the radicalized minorities against what they call the Goyim of the aristocracy (or Ameristocracy), and this has been quite successful in cementing the Euro-Jews’ hegemonic monopoly today so that 9/10 of the so-called 1% are, as many are just now learning, Jewish.

And this brings us inexorably to Zionism–which is where all this rhetoric is hatched, calculated to divide and conquer the Goyim–because what’s truly dizzying (from a logician’s standpoint, I mean) is when the Zionists call you a Racist for not wanting to fund the State of Israel with 33% of your tax-funded foreign aid, even while the State of Israel defines itself as a Jewish Democracy (and they ain’t talking about the Jewish Religion, though even if they were it would still be brazenly unconstitutional and ludicrous to favor them)! In fact, the Zionists are even worse than the envy-obsessed Black race baiters not only for the reason stated. The smoking gun is that the Zionists won’t even say “Racist” but have to have their own separate first-class word, “Antisemite”, which yet again drives the point home that the Zionists are the real super-racists, like the mob boss who never gets caught but is the most guilty, and this apart from Jews making up an overwhelming majority of the 1%. The day we get wise to this is the day the Zionists’ evil empire of Kabbalistic mind control finally comes crashing down, so that means any minute now…

[1] Trotsky, by contrast with Stalin, believed in conquering the world for a Global Communist Empire.
[2] Also no Spirit, though later soul weight experiments were carried out predominately in Communist countries determining this to be false, though this has been withheld from the Western World since we’ve been scheduled for economic demolition–er, Communism–and that would just get in the way–er, confuse us.
[3] Basically, Jesuit-championed Liberation Theology and even the Alinskyite school of the Clintons and the Obamas.
[4] Nationalists or “Racists” (Black Nationalists include Muhammad Ali, Bob Marley) similarly believe that there is only the Race or “Nation”…still no Individual.
[5] Whether that System be one of Exploitation/Oppression or of Equality/Fairness.
[6] And good luck proving Systemic Racism’s existence or especially its non-existence–whence Communism’s signature fanaticism stemming from circular reasoning (Capitalism, Communism and Nationalism alike really stemming from divergent modern interpretations of the Babylonian Talmud which had been responsible for the centuries-long Ghetto System).
[7] And by the same token the theorists/theologians themselves will never be made to see themselves as Racists for running around judging others based on race, because to state the case plainly, they’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.
[8] Your “ruling elite”, “political class” the “uber-rich”, mafiosi, and of course the “banksters”.

The lost Goddess of Christians?

pSophia meant “wisdom” long before there the term had a humanoid personification in the Mediterranean world–though there is the Owl of Athena (a.k.a. Minerva) and the Bee. In fact, the Goddess Sophia* is most clearly viewed as an early Christian concept, the result of a merger of Judaism with Hellenism. And it isn’t simply that Paul got the bright light to take the Gospel to the Goyim. Rather, the Gospel with its penchant for impractical paradox and its allergic reaction to spiritless authoritarianism really streams in from India. Recall that Jesus’s human sponsors were of Galilee, north of Samaria, spoke Aramaic (the closest thing to Arabic) which was the language of the Samaritans (whose descendants the Druze are a sect of Islam), and half of Jesus’s disciples’ names are Greek. Hence there was likely a lot of alchemy and Kabbalah, for starters. In Jesus’s own synagogue in Caphernahum (later Nahum then Hum, now in ruins) we find from around 300 AD one of the first-ever instances of a hexagram** in a Hebrew context.

It seems that it was Hebrews that first spoke of Wisdom (Chokmach) in the personified feminine (see the Book of Wisdom), since it’s nowhere found in the Classical Greek*** or Egyptian pantheon. (But see the male Ganesha [or female Uma] in India!)

So to make up for the Greeks’ lack of Wisdom Goddess, the Gnostics**** taught that Helen of Troy was an incarnation of Sophia, who is in fact the mother of Elohim (originally Canaanite!) the Hebrew Creator (or as they call him the Demiurge which roughly translates to “Construction Worker”). Elohim, in the Gnostic (and later Theosophistic) view, though believing himself the only god (due to his being the only child of an unwed and indeed virgin mother), would not be the same as the Father of Jesus, who is completely non-material, non-egotistical and in fact is in the center of all–the only real thing of which all visible things are just the remotest effects or distant shadows.

The purpose of Sophia’s incarnation as Eve (Mother of Adam?) and subsequent reincarnations is to restore a bungled creation through the heart of every being back to the One. This is the aim of enlightenment, which properly understood is Christianity’s real goal and not a petty flight from the much imagined flames of hell for goodness’ sake. In fact, the Golden Rule isn’t just a moral code but a mystical compass, since it teaches not only to treat your neighbor as you would have them treat you but that, if you can hear it, your neighbor is you and you are your neighbor.

True Christianity is really Hinduism, and true Hinduism is really Jainism. True religion is nonviolent, non-absolutist and non-possessive. It’s even non-theistic, inasmuch as the true God is not even a “god” but may be seen as the inherent singularity of all beings, which this author experiences as the ultimate joyful happiness and peaceful companionship. Hence, I think I can say this: Go and learn to seek, and ye shall find God.

Image result for goddess sophia

* As in Maria Sophia, Simon the Magician’s “lovely assistant” or the Pistis Sophia, an “accidentally” lost gospel.
** “Star of David”–huge scam we can go into later if you’re interested, suffice it to say it comes from India and is heavily used later by the Khazars
*** Socrates was interested in Sophia but not gods, and in the Athenian paradigm they seemed to be at cross purposes!
**** A quite Hebrew school/s in Alexandria that had been fired up a few years before Jesus, by people like Philo.