If your knowledge of Roman Catholicism comes from Monty Python, you might think they’re a prolife group that was started in the 1970s. In fact they’re a bit older than that, though like their nemeses the Freemasons probably not nearly as old or as unchanged as they claim. And in that time, particularly in the last 150-or-so years, they’ve come up with some rather compelling socioeconomic theories that (thank heaven) certainly give Karl Marx a run for his royalties.
Blogger’s rundown of human life on earth IDENTITY is built upon SOCIETY is built upon ECONOMY is built upon FOOD is built upon LAND is the “real estate” (Note: this applies to hunting-gathering as much as to farming.)
Most lifelong Catholics are at least nominally aware of the existence of such things as “common sense” or “Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum“, and yet in simply searching through quotes of note (a dangerous hobby I’m learning), I found myself utterly speechless by how unapologetically the views of the bastions of twentieth-century Catholic orthodoxy in the economic arena CONDEMN the at times tinnitus-inducing views of those men and women who are most likely to have on that very day lit a votive candle to venerate said bastions. Here’s a quick timeline for your notes, FREE OF CHARGE:
1891 – POPE LEO XIII makes an inseparable link between capital and labor:
“Capital cannot do without labor, nor labor without capital”
Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum, 1891
1907 – Pope Saint Pius X refers to the temple peddlers whom Jesus violently drove out of the temple as “Philistines” (Palestinians?).
1928 – G.K. CHESTERTON stresses capitalism’s striking similarity to socialism in theory:
“There is less difference than many suppose between the ideal Socialist system, in which the big businesses are run by the State, and the present Capitalist system, in which the State is run by the big businesses.”
G.K. Chesterton, Illustrated London News, 1928
1951 FULTON SHEEN notes capitalism’s historical usefulness for inaugurating socialism:
“Those who think that capitalism and socialism are enemies should long ponder, how the capitalistic system of England (European Union) has without any revolution, become socialistic. Capitalism in the United States has ‘not yet’ become socialism, but the growing power of the State indicates that the transition is taking place slowly. It may be inquired when the transition of one to another takes place without revolution.”
Ven Abp Fulton Sheen, Toledo Blade, 1951
1952 – FULTON SHEEN calls capitalism a sinful system:
“Both capitalism and socialism are opposite sins against property. Capitalism emphasizes private rights to property without any social responsibility to the common good; socialism emphasizes the social use of property, to the forgetfulness of personal rights. The true solution is one in which the rights to property are personal, but the responsibility is social. A man is free on the inside because he can call his soul his own; he is free on the outside because he can call his property his own.”
Ven Abp Fulton Sheen, Crisis in History, 1952
1954 – DOROTHY DAY quotes L’Osservatore Romano denouncing capitalism being rotten to its very core, contrasted with communism:
“Capitalism seizes, confiscates, and dries up wealth, i.e. reduces the numbers of those who may enjoy riches, holds up distribution and defies Divine Providence who has given good things for the use of all men. Saint Thomas Aquinas says that man must not consider riches as his own property but as common good. This means that communism itself, as an economic system, apart from its philosophy – is not in contradiction with the nature of Christianity as is capitalism”. Furthermore, “Capitalism is intrinsically atheistic. Capitalism is godless, not by nature of a philosophy which it does not profess, but in practice (which is its only philosophy), by its insatiable greed and avarice, its mighty power, its dominion.”
Count de la Torre, L’Osservatore Romano, 1949 – Dorothy Day, The Catholic Worker, 1954
Now I personally would differ with de la Torre and Day in that Marx and Engels were professed materialists. This of course implies a denial of the spirit which more than covers the ultimate blasphemy against the Holy Spirit which Jesus calls the only unforgivable sin!
Friedrich Engels wrote in 1880 that:
“The materialist conception of history starts from the proposition that the production of the means to support human life and, next to production, the exchange of things produced, is the basis of all social structure; that in every society that has appeared in history, the manner in which wealth is distributed and society divided into classes or orders is dependent upon what is produced, how it is produced, and how the products are exchanged. From this point of view, the final causes of all social changes and political revolutions are to be sought, not in men’s brains, not in men’s better insights into eternal truth and justice, but in changes in the modes of production and exchange.”
Engels, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific, 1880
With that having been said, the evils of capitalism (both inherent and manifest, upon which no one having read this can continue to credibly plead invincible ignorance) is a subject that American Catholics need to stop crossing the highway to avoid just because the capitalist system is helping them at the expense of the whole rest of the world. (Optional: HYPOCRITES!)
I would liken the body to a car you drive. As with different drivers, different souls identify to varying degrees with their shells. If someone’s soul/mind is absent often due to trauma-induced demoralization, we say they’re a shell. I was nothing but a shell until recent years. They called it autism. Cannabis helped me come out of my shell. But ganja or no, I’ve just never known why I had to tow the empire line and pretend it wasn’t laughably convoluted and corrupt. I merely lacked the words to call out the culture codependency and conspiracy that had me logistically hemmed in for most of my life, and the evidence suggests they would have had me lobotomized or worse to silence my voice, perhaps not unlike what happened to JFK’s sister. Frankly, I’m trying to learn about permaculture and earthships so I can become fully food independent, preferably underground and fully undetectable.
To strengthen the earlier point, the Upanishads call the soul “a flame the size of a thumb”, which of course recalls to mind the “pilot light”!
1. A drama major in the role of some kind of genuine, serious, concerned intellectual heavyweight (like Hitler, most race baiters, and most public figures who front for the real power brokers), King was finally found to have plagiarized his doctoral thesis paper in 1991. (His degree wasn’t revoked, they essentially said, because he’d been killed already: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king.html.)
2. King and Parks were scripted and coached at the Highlander Center, and their “poor boy” activism was all strictly coordinated with the mass-media for maximum Communist-friendly impact (shockingly similar to the hugely MSM-exaggerated and -misrepresented “Hippie movement”): https://www.highlandercenter.org/about-us/
For the individual in isolation, practicality means thinking for oneself. For the member of society, contrariwise, practical necessity dictates sharing those sentiments and signaling those virtues–and even the word virtue here means not ‘strength’ but a ‘weakness’ (sincere or strategic?) for one’s fellow man–that are readily acceptable to the intellectually flatlining, subliminally subdued herd.
Yet this blogger finds that the most treacherous socialites and the most avid social climbers are also the best at acting very urbane and debonair (for the femmes) while showing a macho face (to the butches). The accomplished socialite is so often also a predator (and certainly if nothing else a charlatan) that I would offer the shorthand Socialitism is depredation.
How gently does the farmer make the earth his slave, and how deftly does the internationalist make the masses his! For the pseudo-alpha social cultivator, as for Jung, there is no existential individual but only Types.
Yet similarly the seasoned follower (yours truly) begins to perceive patterns and types among these dazzling misleaders, and this of course is where the tail begins to wag the dog and the perennial nobody, heretofore encumbered by actually being the deep thinker and scrupulous observer that the formula leader plays for the audience, like every underdog, eventually has his day, a day that is shared of course by the legitimate interests of the common man in general.
Against such a day, the best lie the social engineers ever told us was to Beware the loner!
I asked people to refer to me as a prophet AND KING OF THE EARTH, GOD TO MY GENERATION, AND PRESIDENT OF THE SPIRIT-WORLD.
I claimed to have visions of angels AND OF DIVINITIES, AND THEY LATER SCRUBBED THE ONES WITH OBVIOUS PAGAN CONTENT SUCH AS GUARDIAN SPIRITS IN THE HILLS.
I practiced polygamy, even marrying a girl who was unacceptably young for that time WITH INSTANT FULL PRIVILEGES, WHILE LYING TO MY WIFE, I FORNICATED WITH THEN MARRIED A TOTAL OF 44 WOMEN, 7 ADULTEROUSLY, 7 TEENS, INCLUDING MOTHER-DAUGHTER AND SISTER SETS, BUT PROVIDED ZIP FOR THEIR WELFARE.
I claimed to revere Jesus yet stated that all the disciples of his disciples had corrupted his message and that he was no more divine than you or I, PROVIDED THAT WE BE WHITE, WEDDED AND WITH OFFSPRING.
When it became obvious that most of the Whites in the nation weren’t going to invest in my message (doubtless owing to its over-abundance of fraud and emotional blackmail), I bitterly ordered my enemies killed, ABUSED MY PROPHET CON TO VEIL DEATH THREATS AS ‘PREDICTIONS’, AND WAS PLANNING TO SURPRISE EVERYBODY WITH A HOLY WAR ON THE GOVERNMENT BY ALLYING MYSELF WITH THOSE I HAD CALLED DAMNED (DARK-SKINNED NATIVE AMERICANS), AND I TAUGHT THAT SUICIDE MAY ATONE FOR SIN.
A virtue-signaling social justice warrior (literally), I LOOKED DOWN ON HONEST LABOR AND EXCLUDED BLACK MEN FROM THE HIGHEST HONORS.
I forbade my followers from drinking alcohol AND COFFEE, YET I WAS KNOWN FOR TAKING THE LORD’S NAME IN VAIN (AS IF ANYTHING COULD WEAKEN MY TESTIMONY EVEN FURTHER); ALL TOLD, I FORMALLY BROKE AT LEAST SEVEN OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. (MY CONVICTION FOR THEFT IS ON THE TOWN RECORDS OF PALMYRA, N.Y.)
I violently silenced all dissenting voices AND TERRORIZED ALL WHO TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT ME, EVEN HAVING MY MEN DESTROY A NEWSPAPER PRESS!
Drunk with patriarchy, I TAUGHT THAT WOMEN REQUIRE A HUSBAND TO RAISE THEM UP TO LIFE AFTER DEATH.
A tireless pain in the neck of every innocent human for miles around, I WENT EVEN FURTHER AND HAD MY FOLLOWERS BAPTIZE THE REMAINS OF THEIR DEPARTED ANCESTORS.
My teachings rest not on facts but on feelings, AND I TEACH MY FOLLOWERS THAT IF HEARING ME GIVES THEM A “BURNING IN THEIR BOSOM” THAT ALONE “PROVES” MY WORDS ARE TRUE.
I resist all reform and enlightenment, AND MY FOLLOWERS IN YOUR LIFETIME INCONSIDERATELY BANG ON THE DOORS OF GOD-FEARING, LAW-ABIDING PERSONS IN AMERICA AND AROUND THE GLOBE, HARASS THOSE WHO HAVE HAD ENOUGH HYPOCRISY, AND HAVE TRANSFORMED THE C.I.A. INTO A PATHOLOGICAL LYING BORG.
“The [Christian] Bible tells us to love our neighbors, and also to love our enemies. Probably because they are generally the same people” (G.K. Chesterton).
My favorite religious exercise is removing the politics, and what this keeps revealing is something ecumenical, spiritual, life-giving and beautiful. One of the most distinctive traits of human nature is our hatred (actually envy) of our neighbors. This is strongest where the neighbors in question are one’s “elder brothers” from whom one’s religious cult borrows substantially.  Such is the case with Christians vis-à-vis Muslims. For all the hatred we seem duty-bound to bear Muslims–or perhaps causing it—most of modern Western Christianity’s formal devotions and doctrines are a clear and direct product of Mohammedism. Indeed, Islam is the quintessence of organized monotheism, and it’s super-obvious that those who hate Islam most energetically are the most wedded to the forms Islam has lent them.
The Angelus. As Salvador Dalí first knew, the original painting contained no church and no basket but a black box which Dalí posited was an infant coffin.  Though long considered a quintessentially medieval devotion, the Angelus (ca. 1210) postdates the Adhan (Muslim call to prayer) (ca. 600) by about 600 years and was founded by the mendicant Franciscans who having departed from traditional monkish ways are known for their Islamophilia. 
But as I myself harbor no mindless or slavishly submissive attachments to the many and sundry Islamic loan-forms that are the pillars of today’s Western Christianity, I likewise don’t fall prey to the hatred my unconscious/unrepentant plagiarist-religionist brothers and sisters are bound by human nature to feel.
Rather, I have taken it upon myself to pop open the hood of religion, and in so doing I have found a vast labyrinth of political-rhetorical brain teasers, dating to before Muhammad, before Constantine, before Irenaeus, back to where the so-called Way movement was limber and catholic . The solution to pretentious predication is humble honesty.
In light of the above, I propose we all:
rein in our respective clergymen and intellectuals.
stop caving to their egos and rendering them far more than their due.
leave room for source-wisdom by not allowing them to fill us up with surface commentary under the guise of “relevant applications”, because it is precisely there that they cheat us out of integrity and integration.
“[Islam] set, once again, an enduring lesson of human history: it is through openness and enquiry, engagement and accommodation, and respect for diversity that humanity advances, nations progress and the world prospers. And, this is the message of Sufism, one of the greatest contributions of Islam to this world.” (Indian Prime Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi)
 That will include all neighboring and/or older civilizations.
 Dalí further interpreted the painting as portraying dominatrix dynamics, symbolized by the praying mantis.
 It was the Islamophile mendicant (Franciscano-Jesuit) party whose influence pushed Pope Pius IX to ratify the dogmas of Papal Infallibility and of the Immaculate Conception, both in the 19th century.
 Small-ccatholic means “universal”.
In truth, neither sin nor grace may be ascribed to a social system: therefore Pope Francis has to be speaking in a folksy and jovial tone, which it sounds like he is given the fact that moments later he says he will not pray for Moore whose prayers he has just requested. (The only alternative would be that, like a majority of Jesuits, we’re dealing with a wanton heretic who has no business leading the Church of Jesus Christ and should immediately request a transfer to the party-approved splinter group in China which he obviously favors.)
Grace and sin, properly speaking, only occur within the human soul. Grace realigns “spirit, soul and body” (1 Thessalonians 5:23) and unites the whole person to God; sin fragments and scatters. As most abstract reasoners have probably figured out by now, Marxists reject the whole idea of spirit, although extensive experiments in soviet and Maoist laboratories have proved the human soul’s measurable mass and visible brightness. The scientific discovery of superscientific (because supernatural) reality clearly contributed a philosophic death knell to “pure Communism” which was quietly substituted by the nationalist heterodoxy which the German people had embraced earlier on.
In the Roman and Anglican tradition this big lie of denying the spirit is is termed Modernism and was called by one sainted pope “the synthesis of all heresies”. It is a self-defeating synthesis of religion and atheism that professes faith in God but in none of God’s works. It most likely stems from the illuministic and deistic trends of the late 18th century. These in turn stem from the Jesuits and further back the Sadduceical Judaism of the Sephardim or Iberian Jewry. Jesus says that blaspheming against the Holy Spirit eternally mars the soul. But significantly Jesus and his followers nowhere say to take up arms to combat poverty, usury or even slavery. Rather they insist that these dynamics can be embraced and redeemed if one is pure of heart. Shallow and sordid people pretend Jesus didn’t care about what they call “social justice” and for sure he explicitly made no prayer for the world at large but only for his disciples, but it’s clear that he wanted them to renew the world in due course. In Gospel terms the end and the means are never considered separately, and this is hard for modern man, specialized and codependent as he is, to wrap his psyche around. Jesus does offer techniques (which they don’t want you learning) by which the individual may buck the system in an enlightened manner that won’t merely substitute one system for another while injuring your own soul in the process. One such technique is turning the other cheek thus drawing public attention to the oppression that is in progress; another is observing the law rather than the examples of the appointed leaders. But the idea is always that personal integrity is not only the highest good but is furthermore the only intelligent way to correct society’s issues. “Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth” (Luke 11:2c) and “Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.” (Matthew 15:11)! If I am not aligned within, what possible answer can I offer the outer dynamics? What is worse, if I waste my efforts on things that perish, I’ve totally neglected lasting things. Jesus does the opposite, and that’s why he’s Jesus. If you want Marx or Mohammed, that’s fine with me, I personally happen to consider Jesus’s approach the saner of the two (and fundamentally there really are only two).
If you want my advice, reject the voices that pretend to speak for Jesus while throwing him under a bus. Hypocrisy of this magnitude leads to a world of hurt. All they’re doing is dragging you into their sickness so you’ll miss the deeper reality behind our world, and that often makes you easier for them to control. The Gospel is simply more productive than the fake “social gospel”. Pope Francis, unfortunately, is an angry man whose answers are simply devoid of any real street smarts. (He was never a parish priest, which might explain a few things.) He’s a fragile elitist, a classic tyrant, and a disciple of Marx, I regret being the one to say it.
“At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes” (Luke 11:35).
DESPITE ITS TIMING, THIS IS NOT A POLITICAL NOR MUCH LESS RADICAL POST. I WOKE UP WITH THIS THOUGHT AND DRAFTED THIS NONSTOP FROM THE TIME I AWOKE. IF YOU CAN’T DIG IT, JUST MOVE ON. I HATE POLITICS BECAUSE I HATE DRAMA. THIS IS FOR INSIGHT PURPOSES ONLY. I DO NOT CARE HOW YOU VOTE, EXCEPT THAT IT BE HOW YOU WANT TO VOTE AND NOT HOW I WANT YOU TO VOTE!
The hijacking of the name Christian by those who promote Judaizer ideologies may be traced from the “Reformer” John Calvin, through the Puritan “Pilgrims”, and down to today’s so-called “Pentecostals”. These groups may be characterized by their reprobate tendency to neglect the Gospel’s transcendence of, and as it were spirit-led injunction on, paradigms of the flesh: nationalism, legalism, blind submission, and seeking signs (not wisdom and not Christ crucified) to the point of eclipsing the Gospel’s sapiential character.
Now arguably this began with Western Rome’s gradual departure from all things Greek and its growing coziness with the machista Mithraists and semi-Arian Visigoths while condemning the more mystery-geared Manicheans and the Gnostics. This all tended to weaken Rome’s association with any credible Gospel philo-sophia. Indeed that Rome was the illegitimate father of Calvinism–which I would characterize as the Pharisaical takeover of the name Christian and which we can therefore class as history’s real anti-Christ (literally meaning “that which stands in the place of Christ”)–may be seen in medieval Rome’s (later “heretical”) teaching of predestination, believed as it was throughout the Middle Ages and even expressed by that peerless exemplar of Western Christianity Francis of Assisi.
People who “play Jew-ish” and obtusely neglect sophia have hijacked the name Christian while remaining, in spirit and in truth, outsiders to the true Church, which as the semi-mystic Luther noted cannot be tied to this world in which there can be no justice, rendering legislation an exercise in futility. The Judaizers down through the centuries always remind me of the Apostle Peter who when Jesus dies basically says “C’est la vie, come on men, the nets won’t tend themselves”. Like Martha, today’s pathologically miracle-obsessed, spiritually underdeveloped “Christians” haven’t the slightest interest in Jesus’s sayings, least of all the passages where he presumes to qualify and summarize the Ten Commandments, and they only pay lip service to afterlife jargon which they are at pains to frame in a politically tactical way. That this short selling of the Good News goes back to Western Rome, and even to Constantinople, is seen in Constantine’s Creed’s studied neglect both of Sophia and of the more vital, complex and cathartic view of the afterlife (and indeed of the inner life!) which we had from the Church in Egypt and which was all but erased from memory by zealous priests under Constantine, who is the central figure of a new worldly, carnal and ultimately diabolical ecclesiology which some Reformers like Luther at least had the spine to debunk. But the Gnostics, whether ancient or modern, with their feminine Sophia archetype and reincarnation, always seem to be the sowers of the authentic, contemplation-based, and sound-minded character of Christianity while younger souls reap political capital by playing the Judas or, as I say, the anti-Christ. They prematurely reap an immature Christianity that is barely distinguishable from Judaism or from Islam.
Now President Donald J. Trump is a marginal Presbyterian (see also Congressionalists, later Congregationalists) born rich, spoiled rotten, never repented of his sins, loved the limelight and had his daughter marry into the Kushner Slumlord Dynasty which, symbolically enough, sold 666 Fifth Avenue for the highest amount in the history of New York real estate. But that’s only where the bad Kushner omens begin. Jared Kushner, whom Trump fought tooth and nail to grant top secret access, holds stock in the RFID chip industry–you know, that implantable computer chip, that gateway drug to the hyper-dystopian (and more immediately sociopathic) transhumanist agenda, that Christians today all insist is the Mark of the Beast (heedless of the difference between one’s wrist and one’s forehead–so that literally they may be said not to know their head from their blessed assurance). During the Trump (or more accurately Kushner) regime, while we were all watching Florida (and generally everywhere except the Midwest), Wisconsin allowed a private company to do what your worst boss secretly wanted to do to you, namely implant their employees with the RFID chip under pain of You’re fired! Again, this made rich Jared Kushner richer. I think that while we knew we were electing “a businessman not a politician”; what we didn’t know was that there is a fine line between trader and traitor and that in his eyes we are the commodities to be traded.
Finally, it can’t be overstated that today’s “Evangelical” has ignored the central signs of their arguably quasi-Scriptural eschatology (that is “End Times Table”), nor can it be overstated that this willful ignorance is due to their blind belief that Trump and his über-rich Jews (like Nixon, Trump seems to hate all but the sociopaths of the race) are chosen, anointed, ordained, predestined, and just generally better than poor little you or me. After all, the untold wealth we all know but can’t bring ourselves to admit they boast is all the proof we seem to need of divine favor, never mind that how they got so unthinkably rich was by maniacally destroying Mankind and Creation generally. President Donald J. Trump is the de facto Pope of “Evangelical” “Christians”, and if the Popes of Western Rome have taught us one thing, this should signal that there is no sin this POTUS can commit that will shake the faith of his sheeple. Even if our Commander-in-Chief were the spirit of the anti-Christ made flesh, they have clearly demonstrated this will only make them cry the louder: USA! USA!
In case you missed this major detail (as Pope Francis may have done), Jesus for his part outlines no social or community program and nowhere condemns usury or slavery, to the chagrin of Social Gospel enthusiasts like Martin Luther King (who prefers Gandhi as a lawgiver for Christians). What such self-important figures never mention is that Jesus solves injustice better than any program or agenda ever could. Namely, he solves the problem of the heart which solves the whole problem: as above so below; “on earth as it is in heaven”! The Gospel’s indomitable anti-exploitation tactics include turning the other cheek (which means passive-aggressively drawing attention to the oppression) and doing what the religious authorities say but not what they do (which again draws attention to the double-standard that creates conditions necessary for inequity). By living on spirit, wisdom, and in the moment, Jesus’s true disciples in their pure and inwardly free way reflect a completely aetherial kingdom with no human king. No king but King Jesus! No earthly crown but thorns! And certainly no other form of government, since a republic is totally unbiblical anyhow (at best outlined perhaps by Plato, with whom the medievals may be said to have conflated Jesus). If you want to know the honest truth, these three things are ultimately mutually exclusive and may be said to coexist only uneasily: spirit, family and state. In sum, Jesus knew how society worked, rejected the whole thing, and gave us plenty of tools for sabotaging all systems of enslavement, tyranny, and oppressive legalism whether overt or covert, but it all begins within and above, and our motives must never be to establish a worldly order that will only become infested with more unclean spirits of depredation and degradation. All we ever needed was the truth of the Lord’s Prayer: As in heaven above (♠), so on earth below (♥); as within (♣), so without (♦)!
Of adjacent interest: Moses as type of the Christian devil. How many parallels can you think of in sixty seconds? Start the timer!
THE OVERWHELMING BODY OF EVIDENCE EVERYBODY IGNORES
Martin Luther King Jr, certainly a hyper-political shill (he plagiarized his doctoral thesis) under globalist guidance, loved to bloviate on how the Gospel was incomplete based on the fact that Jesus set forth no social program (which is the same impulse, incidentally, that started legalistic Islam and intellectualistic Communism). Not-Doctor King proposed that Gandhi (who incidentally despised Black Africans) completed Jesus’s message because he gave it sociopolitical legs. While Gandhi (who was kind of a weirdo) espoused many wise (i.e. not merely strategic) approaches, the Gospel exists in contradiction to both the Talmud (“traditions of men”) and the Pax Romana (“princes of the gentiles”), since flesh- and world-based law and policy kills breath, spirit, conscious, intuitive, fluid and baptismal dynamics. Jesus was about undoing Rome’s stranglehold on the human spirit, not that you’d know it to hear many a modern theologian yuck it up. And there are three specific points I can name off-hand where Jesus basically says to hell with the system!
Judge not. Like all worldly, institutional rituals (such as crafting laws and picking wars), the habit of judging a “defendant” leads us down the road to hell because it is based on hypocrisy. The very name Satan means “the accuser”. In nearly every case, what we judge others guilty of, we are ten times more guilty of in some form, often better hidden than our scapegoat. Thus, the impulse to judge is an impulse to cover up our own sins thereby avoiding the heartfelt repentance that the Gospel stubbornly requires. Whoever judges others clearly signals that he hasn’t sincerely turned away from sin. You’ll note that Jesus never judges individuals for sins or crimes in any formal way, but he merely describes patterns in group dynamics or names the moment in which he finds himself, maintaining his powers of discernment free and clear of written claptrap. Jesus could not have been more emphatic than he was that the law boils down to empathy, and that is a law that can’t be enforced by human functionaries. This is a paradigm of restorative rather than punitive justice. That is how problems actually get resolved: that is how you and I can actually achieve that which judging only pretends to do.
Let your yea be yea. Jesus condemns the taking of oaths as being satanic in origin, since it militates against innocence, purity and honesty in ordinary/“profane” contexts. Similar to how gay marriage is a mockery of true marriage, oaths are a finger in the eye of everyday affirmations. Jesus often sounds like a humanist (like where he says that the Sabbath was created for man and not the other way), and here he exposes the half-baked mysticism that underpins organized religion, and in turn the half-baked religiosity that underpins organized society.
It shall not be so among you. It isn’t wrong as some suggest to call Jesus radical, since for fuck’s sake he demands that we reform our whole notion of authority. Even while his disciples are still thinking as man thinks, Jesus makes it clear that he will not sit for his followers becoming organized in the violence-based authoritarian hierarchy of the Roman model. Not only that, but Jesus outlines the complete opposite of the Roman structure wherein his followers would actually exalt those who serve freely and clearly, since that is how God operates, how love operates, how the spirit operates, and how few if any churches much less governments today operate.
STOP BEING A HYPOCRITE. THE CHURCH AS WE KNOW IT WAS CLEARLY INSTITUTED BY CONSTANTINE, NOT JESUS.
“As soon as you discard scientific rigor, you’re no longer a mathematician, you’re a numerologist” (the character Sol Robeson in the 1998 film Pi ).
Aneurysm advisory! What follows is batty even by the standards of Jewry, who as a statistical demographic suffer from a drastically higher rate of schizophrenia than do those of European stock.  Persons with a weak heart should consider themselves hereby warned to read further at their own risk. Please stand by for thorough reality check.
The biggest problems with giving the six million figure any historic seriousness are: 1. Nobody knows how many Jews died through the German occupations. 2. Stalin killed roughly thirteen million Jews among his eighty million or so total victims in the much underpublished Great Purge of 1936 to 1938! 3. The current Auschwitz tour guide, which previously read four million (4,000,000), now reads seven hundred thousand (700,000).
The following accounts for where that bizarrely persistent number “six million” (6,000,000) actually originates, why it was used in Jew-controlled newspapers long before Adolf Hitler, indeed form the turn of the 20th century , and why it’s still commonly used stateside almost exclusively in connection to that loved, hated and feared man and symbol Adolf Hitler, despite the fact that the official tour guide at Auschwitz, partly thanks to the almost insane courage of an irreligious Brooklyn Jew by the name of David Cole , has a number that’s less than one-eighth of that, and totally ignoring the fact that Joseph Stalin, who was the first to recognize Israel by law (or in Latin de jure) , was responsible for over double that number of Jewish deaths.  In short, Why is the number six million so important to some modern Jews?
The scope of this blog post does not deal with the many other instances of the number six in Ashkenazic Hyper-Nationalism or Jew Age Movement (henceforth referred to simply as Political Zionism), such as the ironically Islam-based “Star of David” on the Israeli flag or indeed the date 1666 in which was revealed a key messianic figure to the entire movement.
In the third scroll of Israelite Law, Leviticus 25:10b (KJV) reads:
“it shall be a jubile unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family.”
Now there’s just one weird thing about this passage. Ordinarily the Torah would spell the word for “return”  as תשובה (/teshuva/), but in this instance it has dropped the letter ו (“vav”), leaving only תשבה (/teshua/?). 
Now of course we all know full well that Jews are perfect and can’t make mistakes , so the fanatically Kabbalistic sect of esoteric Jews known as the Hasidim, a brand-new quasi-Christian math cult , refer us to the Zohar (that is, the main book of Kabbalah written in Spain [by real Jews] as late as the 13th century AD). These clearly not insane men gleefully inform us unwary civilians that the “vav” omission is no mistake but is—Oy McVeigh—numerology! 
Now I want to say, in their defense, that everyone who gets into the Kabbalah ends up as mad as a March Hare, be he Jew or Goy. Examples of this abound: Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Manly P. Hall, and of course, G-d forbid, “Madonna”. I would theorize that they got sucked in with promises of being better than the rest of us and by the time they learned it was all hogwash they simply had too much mystique riding on it to admit it publicly. The story of every cult and multilevel marketing scheme since forever.
So the numerology of teshuva totals 708 (tav = 400; shin = 300; bet = 2; vav = 6). 
Now at this period in history, the spirit of the Enlightenment had reached the far corners of Slavland, including Russians and Ashkenazim . The result is that many “Jews” hit the road never to return to the ghetto within which the rabbi, Torah guru figure that he was, had such a remarkable stranglehold on every aspect of the Jewish layman’s life. Jews were becoming Europeans, socialists, scientists, and rather understandably—and Einstein epitomizes this—wanted nothing to do with the god of the rabbis who had kept them in the dark ages so far into modernity!
In response, many a rabbi’s son adapted and embraced godlessness. Many others relapsed to theism. In the mix you had capitalism and communism. The Jewish State project seemed the answer to the prayers of the godly and the godless alike, and this was long before Hitler, beginning in fact with the Dreyfus affair, ca. 1900 , the same time where we see the number “six million” began to explode in Jew-owned newspapers. Going by the timeline, the number six million has nothing to do with Hitler but does coincide amazingly well with the plans of the of political Zionists. The number six million began to explode in the media because the Jewish intelligentsia, led by Theodor Herzl the first Political Zionist, suddenly decided that Jewish assimilation into Europe was a fool’s errand and that another European state far from Europe for Jews was called for. And Herzl knew how to persuade religious Jews–in fact, in his diary Herzl even proposed strategic antisemitism as his favorite tool for getting your cozier Jews out of Europe. Zionists created and used Hitler as controlled opposition by creating a strategic crisis.
But how do you get AD 1948 from 708? Well if your nose ain’t bleeding yet, buckle in while I tell you. The official story on this comes from a website called Our Jewish Agenda. It states that we ignore the thousands place and look only at the hundreds, tens and ones columns. (Remember, we’re talking about a religion dominated by accountants.) Proceeding thus, and bearing in mind that the Hebrew Calendar begins in the year 3760 BC, we can say that AD 1948, being equivalent to 5708 in the Hebrew Calendar, is in fact the year of return to the Land their so-called ancestors did so much killing to occupy so long ago.
In other words, unless you’re some stark, raving, chronically hallucinating John Nash type, the religious textual logic of Modern Israel is slim to none. But when Haaretz revealed the Ashkenazi’s alarming disposition toward schizophrenia, I think some alarm bells went off and the patterns finally became clear to the savvy among us, be he a national socialist, an anarchist, a Platonist, or simply a humanitarian.
And now for the real kicker: the Zohar then goes on to declare that “You shall return minus six million“, indicating that at some year ending in 948 (and why not 1948 I ask you?) all the Jews minus six million would return to the Promised Land.
But now let’s take a long-overdue look at the historical record. There were, in fact, never anything close to six million Jews living (or for that matter dying) outside Palestine/Israel, and in April of 2018 the world’s Jewish population was estimated at 14,511,000, of which only 6,589,000 reside in Israel, which leaves nearly 7 million Jews outside of Israel. The prophecy was both far-fetched and if it applies to the year 1948 (as opposed to 2948 or 6,000,948 for example) is unfulfilled and therefore patently false and therefore, religiously speaking, infernal in origin.
But the fact is that Political Zionism was founded on secular beliefs, with religious platitudes sprinkled on as an afterthought, which clearly explains why all of the above is so far-fetched to begin with. The first Political Zionist Theodor Herzl didn’t even circumcise his own son. Hosting the most secular population in the entire Middle East, Israel’s religious credibility hinges on the six million figure. And as long as there are religious Jews to dupe, the Judaeo-Masonic establishment won’t budge on that number, because like their rabbi ancestors they value power not truth. This is all one big chess game for these élitist sociopaths, and any feigned concern for human life is, finally, simply a move calculated to win that game.
The main takeaway is this:
The number six million was always symbolic and never literal.
Furthermore, it’s amazing how a group that pretends to be so wary of all libel and other defamation can be so quick to spread this specious and frankly radicalizing six million figure, so obviously intended to enshrine in “history” an excuse to privilege the Jews and genocide the Europeans, by pretending we’re always on the verge of doing the opposite. Notice, as a case in point, how you invariably get some Controlled Media head that compares every credible statesman to Adolf Hitler–or rather to an absurdist caricature of Hitler that Stalin and friends created practically from scratch.
This blog post was easier to write than you might think, since (as is so often the case with “antisemitic rants”) all of my claims about the Hasidim are naïvely made by the Hasidim themselves!
Please read my other posts on Ashkenazic Hyper-Nationalism (a.k.a. Political Zionism), especially the one that touches on the lies about G-d’s promise to curse those who curse Israel (actually Abraham individually). Blessings! ________  Not to be confused with Life of Pi, a very confusing film that ends seeming to encourage mystical numerology!  This was conclusively proved in a study conducted out of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in cooperation with scientists both in Israel and in the United States. (Most Israeli scholars debunk most of the official story regarding Hitler, the Holocaust and even the ancestral roots of the so-called Jewish people.  As far back as 1900, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, who was the major leadership figure of the American Jewish Congress during its formative period, spoke of the “six million living, bleeding, suffering, arguments in favor of Political Zionism” when he addressed an audience who had come to hear him speak as reported in the New York Times on June 11, 1900.  Alias David Stein, having changed his name to avoid premature martyrdom in the cause of truth at the hands of the criminally insane JDL.  Adolf Hitler too was party to the Jewish State project in Palestine; research “Transfer Agreement”.  Most people already know that the persecutions under Adolf Hitler weren’t what initially sparked the Jewish State concept, though it may be said that the general weariness from which he drew much of his political capital was, and as a surprise to some the German Führer, far from seeking to kill Jews, actually did everything in his power to encourage Jewish settlements in the Levant, though the cynic could argue that this was done to please his campaign financier Max Warburg, a Jewish banker from New York.  Teshuvah is also translated “answer” “completion” or “repentance”, but we know how much trouble this gives certain people who find it much easier to kvetch about everything instead.  When I attempted to verify the Hebrew terms, my online interlinear Bible showed me no such word as as תשובה or תשבה, but rather וְשַׁבְתֶּ֗ם (/wə·šaḇ·tem/, “and you shall return“) and תָּשֻֽׁבוּ (/tā·šu·ḇū/, “you shall return“). תשובה /teshuva/ appeared nowhere in the Hebrew Torah but only twice in the scrolls of each of the following: Samuel, Kings, Chronicles and Job, with the misspelled term appearing nowhere at all. But let’s just humour them for now, just in case they have access to our home addresses through Mossad or something awful like that.  This, I think it worth noting, means that Stalin killed 67 million Christians and even 13 million fellow-Jews intentionally and on purpose.  The Hasidim are a sect that frankly most Jews can’t stand and that most Goys (in other words civilized human beings) tragically mistake for Orthodox Jews (but really have more in common politically with the Sabbatean-Frankists) because both groups dress really weird and regard us Goys as livestock just waiting for them to herd and work us to an early grave, which they already do such a blessed great job of.  Numerology has acquired such a specious reputation that they had to invent a whole new word that means the exact same blessed thing as numerology, and that word is gematria! (It’s similar to how they excrete the word Shoah as a cleaner stand-in for Holocaust.)  I know what you’re thinking: Wouldn’t it be cool if it totaled 666? Well funny story: the word תשובה is number 8666 in Strong’s word list!  (Ha! Thirteen footnotes! This must prove that the USA should hold on to Alaska, I’ll work out the details later, with a little help from my Hasidic friends.) These Ashkenazim often paradoxically refer to themselves as “Jews”, even though they’re of almost the exact same stock as other Russians and Germans and, even worse, the Gentile Patriarch Ashkenaz was by no means in the lineage of Abraham, let alone Jacob.  Jewish prophecies in the Torah require that 6 million Jews must “vanish” before the state of Israel can be formed. “You shall return minus 6 million.” That’s why Tom Segev, an Israeli historian, declared that the “6 million” is an attempt to transform the Holocaust story into state religion. Those six million, according to prophecy, had to disappear in “burning ovens”, which the judicial version of the Holocaust now authenticates. The missing 6 million must be so before the Jews can return to the Promised Land. Jews see this as a cleaning of the souls of the sinful people. As a matter of fact, many Jews believe and profess that: “without the Holocaust, there would be no Jewish State.” The Jews have long been spreading this myth over and over long before world war 1. 1900: “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.” 1905: A Jewish preacher declares that if the (Jewish-led) Communist uprising in Russia succeeds in its long-time goal of overthrowing the Tsarist government, Zionism would be obsolete. “6,000,000 Jews” is mentioned. 1905: The New York Times reports: “From 1890 to 1902 he caused 6,000,000 Jewish families to be expelled from Russia.” 1906: Jewish publicist addresses an audience in Germany where he claimed that the Russian Government had a “solution of the Jewish Question” and that this solution entailed the “murderous extermination” of “6,000,000 Jews.” Of course, the Russians never had any such plans but the fictional story was resurrected during WWII with the Germans being on the receiving end of these slanderous accusations this time around. 1910: In the American Jewish Committee’s annual report it is claimed that since 1890 Russia has had a policy to “expel or exterminate” Six Million Jews. (Source: American Jewish Yearbook pg. 15) 1911: Max Nordau, co-founder of the World Zionist Organization together with Theodore Herzl, made an astonishing pronouncement at the tenth Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland. He claimed that 6,000,000 Jews would be annihilated. This was twenty-two years before Hitler came to power and three years before World War I started 1915: Jewish leader Louis Marshall proclaims: “In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone: Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow…” 1919: Shortly after the end of World War I hostilities, Zionists claim a “Holocaust” of “Six Million Jews” is imminent in Europe in a deceitful campaign to raise money for Jewish charities and also to distract public attention from the Jewish origins of Communism, the Bolshevik atrocities in Russia and the Armenian Genocide. 1940: Jewish leader Nahum Goldmann predicts “Six Million” Jewish victims before Nazi concentration camps have even fully completed construction. 1944: In September of 1944, eight months before the end of WWII, U.S. Communist (Jewish) Union leaders prematurely proclaim that nearly Six Million Jews have been killed, long before that could have been known or calculated. 1945: In January, still many months prior to the end of the war, before any official body count for any group could have reasonably been calculated or ascertained, Zionists proclaim exactly “Six Million Jews” had died. There are so many other examples; these were just a selected few! So the Jews have all along been trying to enforce a prophecy mentioned in the Torah!