Still embedded within the DNA code of the modern scientific community we continue to be stalked by a merchant class ghost, a late medieval superstition sometimes referenced as philosophical materialism, mechanist theory, or simply scientism. (Can you hear them hissing?)

The “Cartesian gospel,” itself chiefly responsible for pitching the earliest versions of the scientific method to the social élite of the day in a long overdue return to Plato off of the Aristotle bender that Thomas Aquinas ✝️ had inaugurated and was so loved by the aristocratic pansexuals and omnivores of the day, preaches that the one and only linchpin between corporeal (body) and spiritual (ghost) is the cerebral “pineal gland” in humans (and really probably just in men) which is supposed to house the soul and bridge the gap between res extensa (objective stuff) and res cogitans (subjective stuff).

Now obviously this sounds at first like another creepy Ignatian ✝️ meditation scripted by the sons of rabbis to sucker some newly culturally uprooted sap in for a lifetime of menial of tasks in service to the neverending, trade-favoring “mission” (“SJihad”), but what we can perhaps say (in today’s vernacular) is that the linchpin between the physical realm (matter) and the conscious realm (the Higgs boson field) is intelligence, souls, or data.

Think of the weight of the soul observed in humans and other beasts* and that minute, invisible weight that computer chips gain when data is recorded onto them.

What if the way my mind operates is in some sense my way of accessing doors (“portals” in pseudoscientific and parapsychological [e.g., “sci-fi and horror”] artistic genres) between worlds and thus reconfiguring paradigms?

And though demonstrably true does this strike you as the kind of information the cultural élite would ever publish willingly or broadcast freely, especially while em-ploy-ing these jargons that they hold most sacred to their class’s (false) sense of security (owing to their ability to finance and even shamelessly bias/spoof “science” [as we’ve already seen that cultural leadership is capable of doing as with Climategate, Covidgate, Dr Judy Wood {again with the academically accomplished female whistleblower}]) such as scientific jargon?

When at last I grasp that spirit is everywhere, and that absolutely anything is a sacred doorway to spirit provided only that I permit my res cogitans (my thinking self) to key in to how x thing is my doorway, I in that same moment wield the power to relinquish (to give one example) imperialism, capitalism, and even patriarchalism, aware that those terms by which I had been taught to discuss the so-called objective or immutable laws of nature** were all scripted based off of how the teacher’s guild wished me to understand my society thus making it as they believed that they wished it to be.

Needless to say the very fact of an overarching vision signals that it will in all likelihood turn fascistic and repressive, whether despite being ostensibly led by biological females (namely schoolteachers whom college professors are forever roasting) or all the more for being thus led.

Now whether you pardon my gainsaying of René Descartes’ ✝️ pilgrimage “angel of truth” (per Rupert Sheldrake ✝️) or whether you burn me at the modern stake that is cancel culture, either way I hope I’ll have moved the needle in a helpful way as we try to come to terms with the interstellar spacecraft 3I/Atlas which has Harvard shrugging aloud (and Marco Rubio claiming they’re busting our nuclear balls).

This has been John McGuire of untrain.org wishing you a highly scientific day.

________

* Until Dr Duncan MacDougall ✝️ was prematurely shut down citing nonspecific ethical concerns; scientific progress has since resumed (together with who knows what other abominations) under Communism and probably also in Switzerland where they do actual physics rather than simply mass-programming using (drippingly scientismic) physics-ese (!). 🐍😾🦢

** Referring here to the first principles of physics which (a) somehow we only discovered in the Victorian 1800s just when the hard sciences in the anglosphere were really languishing and which (b) were later soundly debunked by Rupert Sheldrake and possibly by you if you’ll read and follow his book Seven Experiments That Will Change the World.