ARE “WHITES” REALLY JUST DISAPPEARING ON THEIR OWN
OR IS TODAY’S WORLD RUN BY FANS OF CHARLES MANSON?
Are the fair-skinned peoples of Earth really an endangered breed, or is this narrative that’s being beaten into the mainstream simply yet another example of loud wish-fulfillment by the media (which is owned by an ethnic minority, but decidedly not an oppressed one), with their infinite reserve of reverse racism (to say nothing of sexism), trolling on behalf of the elite who just want us to all shut the hell up about freedom and to slave for them from nine to five or else die? (In other words, Never live by your minds, only ours! Contrast: “Live free or die.”)
.
Apparently, the media—almost sounding like Emperor Palpatine—would like nothing better than for you to rest assured that persons of European heritage will “inevitably” become a minority in the nakedly arbitrary timeframe of 30 years. But with all due respect, how can they seriously know that? The common-sense answer is also the correct one: they can’t.
.
Rather, these loaded projections, transparently calculated to demoralize as much as to “forecast”, are based on a selective range of trends, published with a view to crush morale, and it begs the question of whether you’ll continue to be lame enough to continue let yourself be demoralized by Global Marxists (i.e. the UN and their lackeys) for another 30 years—which again is simply wishful thinking on their part, nothing more. Just you seize their light-years-ahead technology, and then let’s recalculate this thing.
.
Modern people spend more time indoors than any people ever before. Time spent indoors is historically the main cause of a lack of skin pigmentation (or as we’re brainwashed to refer to it “Whiteness”), together with local climates. Doing a quick reality check, all the world’s richest and most powerful people are White males (albeit Ashkenazic). So unless I’m missing something, melanin-free skin would be on the rise were it not for the systemic demoralization of the developed world (and our obsession with travel, promiscuity, and consequent birth control—great examples of how the aspects of the lives of the super-rich we choose to imitate are all the wrong ones, ensuring our imminent doom as a group).
.
This glib, Charles-Manson-esque prediction repeated ad nauseam by the media, representing the financial and political class (whom of course it exempts), clearly coincides with the gutting of the middle class. Whites aren’t disappearing, they are being targeted because with each inbred generation the super-rich become more paranoid. They are quite simply terrified (as only the emotionally stunted can be) by competition and have such advanced technology that they no longer need a work force (i.e. “middle class”). They’re ready to put their toys away—i.e. kill us off. Whites aren’t disappearing—they’re being phased out.
IF EVER THERE WERE TWO NOT-SO-OPPRESSED MINORITIES…
.
Outgoing President Obama, who at any rate was always seen as “Goofy Barry” by everyone (probably all an act to mask his globalist corruption and treason), has lately seemed obsessed with Skokie, Illinois. No one knows why exactly, but my reason would have been the notorious Neo-Nazi uprising, whose ring-leader was forced to step down when he was exposed as…half-Jewish?
.
That’s right: The 1977 engineer of the legally permitted Nazi rally and march in Skokie was National Socialist White People’s Party coordinator Frank Collin—whose father Max freely identified as a Jewish survivor of the (Paleo) Nazi Holocaust, having changed his surname from Cohn (“Cohen”) upon immigration. Moreover, Agent Collin’s mother was reportedly a Catholic.
.
This really got me to thinking about the relationship between Catholic and Jewish élites that’s been developing on the public stage from the mid-60s to present. You know, thanks to our Common Law system (with the exception of famously Roman Catholic Louisiana), the courts, who are increasingly radical, increasingly rule over these United States on behalf of the District of Columbia, Inc. (Connecticut, the most Roman Catholic state in the Union, is also the wealthiest!) That is why it’s funny to consider that today Roman Catholics and Jews jointly control the Supreme Court (6 Catholics, 3 Jews, and nary a Protestant), much to the chagrin of the fabled Pilgrims, FDR, and their heirs the Reformed Christian majority. This is quite a revolutionary development, considering the only Catholic president the US ever had was assassinated at the same time as the Second Vatican Council (or as some have termed it “The Takeover”) was getting underway—and frankly JFK’s martyrdom was no isolated incident, since a slew of wealthy traditional and intelligent Catholics died mysteriously in the ensuing years, with the notable exception of Jeopardy Grand Champion Hutton Gibson, father of famous Mel and prolific critic of the “Neo-Catholicism” that was canonized in Vatican City over the 1960s.
.
And this reminds me of another extremely recent news piece: “Neo-Catholic” Pope Francis just implicitly endorsed the USA’s one Jewish presidential candidate by inviting him (and him only) to the Vatican.
.
In sum, the Vatican élite and financially gifted Jews seem to work well together lately (which is a pleasant way of saying “conspire”) toward socially engineering ends, and I have little doubt the banks are key players in these historically strange bedfellows. But this bedfellowship, strange or not, seems to have really paid off in a worldly way, and as I’ve said, Jews and Catholics have to be the two most un-oppressed minorities—far more like noble bloodlines in today’s geopolitical landscape. (Anyone who’s even remotely awake has heard of the Jesuits and the Rothschilds.) And, considering that the Caesar-imitating “Renaissance popes” (the worst of whom even took telling and violently unchristian names like Alexander and Julius) were likewise eerily friendly to Jewish power, said bedfellowship may not be quite the inspired gesture of tolerance that the politically correct simpleton or Catholic trendy may be hell-bent (!) on reading into it.
A Facebook profile was forcibly disabled for 24 hours today for making the following (incontrovertible) comment: “No other ethnic group calls haters anything except ‘racist’. But Jews invent this linguistic abortion ‘anti-Semite’. Does not speak well to that myth of Jewish intellectual superiority. Buncha quacks.” Please tell his story. Please make the truth of our Judeocentric neurolinguistic programming (NLP) go viral:
There seems to be a cacophony of confusion in the Western world about who or what a “Jew” is, and some of this convolution is the Jews’ own doing, or rather it is due to Jewry’s shockingly wide spectrum of styles* and the constant outflux and influx of people to and from the Jewish identity through the centuries. As ambitious as this may sound to this demoralized civilization that has largely played the role of the megabanks’ bitch, let’s try to clear the air on who or what a “Jew” is, shall we?
The “Star of David” not only bears no connection to the Great King and Psalmist; it was never associated with Judaism at all prior to the 19th century! Where this hexagrammical shape can be found is on the official coin/seal of the Kaganate of Khazaria!
Who or what is a “Jew”?
.
There is no one definition of Jew, so for God’s sake don’t listen to those who claim to have “the one definition” of Jew! This subject matter simply demands maturity.
.
Etymologically, the term Jew (alt. Juive) comes from the name Judah and is a shortening of Judahite. The name Judah can mean: a) the fourth son whose parents were both Jacob (a.k.a. Israel) and Leah; b) one of the Twelve Tribes of Israel (a.k.a. Jacob); and/or c) the southern kingdom formed by the post-Solomonic split of the Kingdom of Israel.
.
Modernly, Jew can mean: a) a descendant of the people who once practiced classical Judaism, i.e. kept the Abrahamic Covenant (Heb. Berith), observed the Mosaic Law (Heb. Torah), and frequented the Solomonic (or later Persian) Temple (Heb. Hekal) (see Jewry, Sephardic Jews); b) one who currently does one (or ideally all) of the three above things (bearing in mind that there is no generally recognized temple that would enable full Judaism to exist, nor has there been such since c. AD 70; see Judaism); and/or c) a subject of Judah, a long defunct kingdom.
.
In none of these ancient or modern senses of the term Jew should it on any account be conflated with Israelite or Hebrew, much less Semite. (Statistically, everyone currently alive who isn’t full-blooded Inca [and very possibly them too] descends from Abraham.)
.
Where are the Jews today?
.
In the full, objective sense there are no Jews currently on Planet Earth. This is chiefly due to the fact that Judaism cannot fully express itself without a central temple (and no, the “wailing wall” doesn’t count!) or at minimum the Arc of the Covenant, which was the Temple’s core symbol, for it contained the Decalogue and Moses’s remains and when last I checked it is in the hands of Egyptian Christian monastics. In concrete terms, what is left of Judaism to those who self-identify with it are its secondary rather than the primary elements.
.
0.2% of the world claims to be Jewish, yet of that some 90% are of an Ashkenazic ethnicity and cannot trace their lineage, DNA, or folklore to any Israelite tribe. Moreover, most so-called “Jews” have gone out of their way to buck classical Jewish traditions in favor of Talmudic and Rabbinical inventions, not to mention Khazar culture. For an example, the vast majority “Jews” from medievality forward follow a matriarchal ancestral lineage, contrasted with the patriatchal model of their oldest scriptures. (!) True traditional Jews, then, are few and far between, and the material resources available for the religious observance their claimed identity would theoretically stipulate are likewise scarce and peripheral.
.
Was Hitler a Jew?
.
To the complete shock of most Westerners and those living in World-Bank-managed vassal-states, many documented facts support the theory that Adolf Hitler the Nazi was in fact an Ashkenazi, a fact that he felt the understandable need to go to great lengths to conceal from the public. All told, these are probably the three most significant documented facts supporting Adolf Hitler’s Khazar-Jewish roots as well as his Israeli political ties: a) Jewish body. Adolf Hitler was circumcised and never let his doctor see his “schlong” (a Yiddish term meaning “snake”). b) Jewish lineage. The Führer’s paternal grandfather was a Jewish trader. Hitler ordered his father’s native village records destroyed and its cemetery demolished and paid hush money to his nephew William. c) Jewish policy. So far as we can tell from the documented orders he gave, Chancellor Hitler complied fully with the Transfer Agreement by maintaining a (Wannsee) Protocol of emigration (never of extermination) from 1933 until at least 1944.
Moreover, political Zionism’s undisputed yet puzzling founding father Theodor Herzl wrote in his diary: “An excellent idea enters my mind. To attract outright anti-Semites and to make them the destroyers of Jewish wealth.”
________
* Surprisingly, “Jews” range from those who observe the Torah and ignore everything else, to those who explicitly reject the Torah as do the disciples of Sabbatai Zevi (“Sabbatean Jews”, founded in 1666) and relatedly the followers of Jacob Frank (“Frankists”)!
Early Christianity, before it became sort of galvanized and Calvinized through persecution, was much more influenced by the more organic, populist, and nonviolent Zen and Gnosis than many suspect. But our church experience too often is that many sermons rob us of our common sense in broad daylight, and many churchy settings seem to have a knack for snatching spiritual defeat from the jaws of victory. Preachers should be teachers, and churches should be schools. But what happens more often than not is that preachers are liars, distorters, manipulators, child molesters, agents of the established order, and in short more ambassadors of (d)evil than of go(o)d. In short, they domineer and commandeer our humanity amid unfalsifiable theology mumbo-jumbo that appears to vaguely promise divinity. As a group, ministers are a lot like healers: some are driven by patient-end results and others by money contributed by the patient to feed the one family they really love—their own. The latter group are charlatans, and what they do is best described in the following terms: a con, a ruse, a scam, a hustle, and a racket.
With that said, how should the awakened congregant respond? One possible first step is to consider my role in this two-way dynamic that only seems on the surface to be asymmetrical. How am I fueling the flames of spiritual deceit? No one can be fooled who has not first fooled themselves. Take some time to take stock of how suggestible a person you are? How easily flattered are you? How invested are you in the worldly systems? Are you a manipulator yourself, who seeks to control the minds of those “beneath” you (such as your “woman” and your “young”)? How much of your daily life is spent acting (be it reacting or play-acting)? If the answers to any of these questions bother you, odds are good you’re part of the problem of Churchianity without even being ordained or appointed!
The secondary question is: How afraid are you to research beyond your pastor’s words? Of the preachers I can’t stand (i.e. the ones who aren’t teachers), some are dogmatic (ordering you on what to believe) while others are weak-kneed (ordering you not to cling fundamentalistically to any creed), but both somehow seem to create the sheeple effect in their aptly-named “flock”.
The “strong delusion” of modern times is that Liberty is somehow the enemy of Security, that you can somehow trade one in for more of the other, that individual freedoms somehow negatively correlate to public safety.
But this antiquated notion has already been richly blown out of the water, by political scientists far more credentialed than I, as being almost as anachronistic as those who cling to the idea that the Vatican (or even the Jesuits) are somehow at the top of the élitist food chain. They’re up there, don’t get me wrong, but to say they’re at the top, you’re simply living in the 1700s, before the Rothschilds’ star began to rise.
And similarly, you have to go back about 100 years to find a time when “law and order” (i.e. government) wasn’t the top non-natural cause of human death, as it has been since at least the hatching of the Bolshevik Plot (i.e. the “Russian Revolution”).
To wit, UH political scientist R.J. Rummel’s research suggests that six times as many people have died from democide (murder by government) during the 20th century than in all that century’s wars combined! democide having just dethroned war as the leading cause of non-natural death, which had been war in all foregoing centuries.
We American churchgoers have been browbeaten into framing our afterlife questions in leading terms that are easy to pretend to have canned answers to, e.g., Where do we go when we die?, which begs the question of whether the afterlife is really a matter of flash mobs rather than the heart?
Paul Gustave Doré’s Woodcut illustration
of Dante Alighieri’s Italian Renaissance epic poem posthumously entitled The Divine Comedy.
Such mass-eschatologies and -soteriologies seem to work extraordinarily well for the clergy classes and religionist racketeers, but by contrast they have precious little basis in any respected mystical visionary or philosophical tradition, and unsurprisingly they offer near-zero nourishment for the sincere seeker.
Such pseudoacademic theologizing as this Where do we go when we die? tripe has its roots in dogmatism¹ and should therefore be consigned to the pile labeled spiritually and sapientially vapid.
Pat answers generally are a lot of clergybabble—static—which are rooted in dogmatism and which work well for the political flavor-of-the-month²…and little else.
For those who spend quality time with the source-texts of Christianity³, it soon becomes clear that these default and binary afterlife destinations are always couched in terms of myth and allegory, and⁴ our experience of “the other side of life”⁵ varies as widely as our experience of this world does—speaking within the dimension of spirit (which is not abstract but rather means breath [as in the respiratory system] and is also a synonym for chutzpah, like in spirit and spunk).
Our experience of both planes of reality—both the inner and the upper—depends greatly on our attentiveness to the intuitive, subtle and subconscious—all things that, unlike the banal sermons we’re mostly treated to, are tough to capitalize on—all things that only the myth or the parable is suited to cultivating in the hearer.
But that’s fine with me, since didn’t the Parabolist himself say:
– “freely ye have received, freely give” (Matthew 10:8b),
– “the kingdom of God is within you” (Luke 17:21b), and finally
– “strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it” (Matthew 7:14)?
________
¹ Dogma is the opposite of Christ’s exclusively parable-based preaching/teaching style.
² The clergy surreptitiously supports whatever government establishment their sheep happen to find themselves under and receives kickbacks from in the form of 501c3 tax breaks.
³ And quality time with the Indo-Egypto-Hebraic sources of those Christian sources.
⁴ Assuming we’re speaking in spiritual terms here.
⁵ As well as our relative glory or obscurity on the other side.
All materialistic pursuits, worldly and carnal as they are, are quantitative (i.e. numerical) in nature, and therefore they are all finite, transient and temporary.
And much of “atheism” is just a “modernism”* that has come out of the Catholic (or Anglican) closet.
Because despite their austere label, “atheists” have gods; the only difference is that their gods are tangible and tend to include Earth (Gaia), other heavenly bodies, and perhaps even Government (Statism).
In short, most of the guys and gals running around calling themselves “atheists” are instead pre-Christian religionists.
In conclusion, a vast majority of atheists aren’t atheists but dogmatic materialists.
Atheism is a philosophy, and all attempts at turning it into a culture, just like all attempts at turning the Christian gospel into a church, have predictably fallen flat on their faces.
________
Modernism is the denial of the past and often of spirituality.
If you’re like me, you’ve been treated to more than one unwanted advance from that well-dressed, smiley and clingy page thumper who claims to know where you can find all the answers and save your soul from a default afterlife that’s allegedly even more excruciating than the encounter you’re presently having—even thought they can’t, for the life of them, articulate just one independent, critical thought. Which begs the question: Who will save your soul (i.e. mind) from this belief system that sounds like something that came straight from the (undisputedly schizophrenic) mind of H.P. Lovecraft?
Faced with such an uncannily sticky social situation (not that different in theory from your brush with that salesman or that politician), you may have thought your only options were joining their cult (which unless you’re broke often involves an implicit “church tax” known as tithing), claiming to be Jewish, or being saddled with something even worse than the lake of fire itself: that all-too-familiar aftertaste of guilt, awkwardness and pity. But that, my friend, is where you’re wrong…
Be their psychological prey no longer!
Defend your sanity with these all-natural, all-rational pest deterrents!
“All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world” (Matthew 13:34-35).
“And he said unto them, Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them” (Mark 4:11-12).
“They have the Churches, but we have the true Faith”
(early Christian saying, regarding the Arian Christians).
“The New Testament is hidden in the Old, and the Old is revealed in the New” (Augustine, Quaestiones in Heptateuchum).
“And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature (Mark 16:15).
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle” (2 Thessalonians 2:15).
“And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death: But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye” (Mark 7:9-13).
Jesus said, “Call no man on earth your father“, but he did give his beloved disciple an earthly mother.
“And I will bless them that bless thee [singular], and curse him that curseth thee [again singular]: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed” (Genesis 12:3), which makes a lot of sense since at this point all families of the earth are descended from Abraham—no more Ashkenazis (who rule the modern State of Israel) than any other group!
“Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile [also translated ‘deceit’]!” (John 1:47).
Zionism: 100% dependent on anti-Semitism.
Road to perdition much? Oh the self-defeating theologies that are born of making a neurotic named Augustine (who couldn’t even read Greek much less Hebrew!) your exclusive patristic authority on Genesis.
“I hope the last Day of Judgment is not far, I persuade myself verily it will not be absent full three hundred years longer” (Martin Luther).
Gee, double-standard much?
Funny thing: Emulating Muslims (in teetotaling, iconoclasm, scriptural literalism, and a general anti-monastic sentiment) while simultaneously hating them…
To what extent has the devil of Christianity come to be portrayed in the same way as the God of the Bible? Lucifer is mentioned one time in the Bible and refers to a king in Babylon. To say Lucifer is Satan is unbiblical fakelore, at best.
Anachronism much?
I’d better withhold comment on the titles I would tend to bestow on them. (Sorry, forgot “Minister”.)
Conclusion: Do you even Gospel, Pastor?!
Also used in genuine priestly chrism (see Christ) or anointing oil.
“God only speaks to me and not so much to you except through me and especially this book that I have, that’s actually an anthology of frankly quite probably altered tales and rules, most of which if you read on are no longer binding anyway. (Sorry about wasting valuable time and trees.) But I have a really cool costume and can drop names so you’ll keep coming back to me, rather than just take the book and walk, which would be an understandable move especially because I’m constantly telling you which parts are literal, which parts are metaphors, and which parts I think God got wrong. Don’t you ever stop to wonder if I really represent God…or perhaps the other guy?”
—Your Pastor’s Name Here
JESUS DOESN’T ANSWER TO YOUR TIDY THEOLOGY
“Heretical/Heterodox Cults” that the Jesus of the Canonical Gospels can easily be and/or has been associated with:
EASTERN RELIGIOUS (well duh, Christianity much?)
CHRISTIAN “ABERRATIONAL” (“The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light” [Matthew 6:22].)
SATANIC (“But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils” [Matthew 12:24].)
OCCULT/WITCHCRAFT/VOODOO (“But without a parable spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples” [Mark 4:34].)
SPIRITUALIST (“And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him” [Matthew 17:3].)
RACE THEORIST (“But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs” [Matthew 15:26]. “Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews” [John 4:22].)
ZEN AND SINO-JAPANESE PHILOSOPHICAL-MYSTICAL (“It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life” [John 6:63].)
FLYING SAUCER AND OUTER SPACE (“And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight” [Acts 1:9].)
PSYCHOTHERAPY (a term that literally means “soul-healing”)
MASS-THERAPY / TRANSFORMATIONAL TRAINING (“For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” [Matthew 26:28].)
POLITICAL (“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace” [Isaiah 9:6].)
NEW AGE (“But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him” [John 4:23].)
COMMERCIALISM (okay, I can’t remember a time Jesus cast a salesman in a positive light; then again, it’s arguably THE MOST WESTERN of the “cults” you listed)
COMMUNAL/SELF-HELP (“And he said unto her, Daughter, thy faith hath made thee whole; go in peace, and be whole of thy plague” [Mark 5:34].)
Paul Gustave Doré’s Woodcut illustration
UnTrain.org 